chr17-31200538-T-C

Position:

chr17-31200538-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2_Supporting

The NM_001042492.3(NF1):c.1005T>C(p.Asn335=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000818 in 1,614,038 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000099 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000080 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

NF1
NM_001042492.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.0500

Variant links:

Genes affected

NF1 (HGNC:7765): (neurofibromin 1) This gene product appears to function as a negative regulator of the ras signal transduction pathway. Mutations in this gene have been linked to neurofibromatosis type 1, juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia and Watson syndrome. The mRNA for this gene is subject to RNA editing (CGA>UGA->Arg1306Term) resulting in premature translation termination. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have also been described for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

NF1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.56).

BP6

Variant 17-31200538-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-31200538-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 184560.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr17-31200538-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.05 with no splicing effect.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 15 AD gene. Variant has AC lower than other variant known as pathogenic in the gene, so the strength is limited to Supporting.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein
NF1	NM_001042492.3 linkuse as main transcript	c.1005T>C	p.Asn335=	synonymous_variant	9/58	ENST00000358273.9	NP_001035957.1
NF1	NM_000267.3 linkuse as main transcript	c.1005T>C	p.Asn335=	synonymous_variant	9/57		NP_000258.1
NF1	NM_001128147.3 linkuse as main transcript	c.1005T>C	p.Asn335=	synonymous_variant	9/15		NP_001121619.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
NF1	ENST00000358273.9 linkuse as main transcript	c.1005T>C	p.Asn335=	synonymous_variant	9/58	1	NM_001042492.3	ENSP00000351015	P1	P21359-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000985

AC:

AN:

152212

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000483

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000162

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000835

AC:

AN:

251448

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0000957

AC XY:

AN XY:

135902

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000185

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000800

AC:

117

AN:

1461826

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000784

AC XY:

AN XY:

727216

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000917

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000149

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000985

AC:

AN:

152212

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000108

AC XY:

AN XY:

74378

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000483

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000162

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000152

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000136

EpiCase

AF:

0.000273

EpiControl

AF:

0.000296

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:9

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:3

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Jan 02, 2018	This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp	Mar 14, 2019	Variant summary: NF1 c.1005T>C alters a non-conserved nucleotide resulting in a synonymous change. 5/5 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 8.3e-05 in 277190 control chromosomes (gnomAD). This frequency is not significantly higher than expected for a pathogenic variant in NF1 causing Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (8.3e-05 vs 0.00021), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. This variant has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (Gasparini_1996, Bottillo_2007), without strong evidence for causality. These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Neurofibromatosis Type 1. Co-occurrences with other pathogenic variant have been reported (Bottillo_2007; NF1 c.476delC , p.Arg160Glyfs*5), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. In an in vitro mini gene assay, the variant was shown to abolish an expression of an alternative transcript lacking exon 7, however the clinical significance of this outcome is unclear (Bottillo_2007). Two clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as benign/likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago	Apr 09, 2020	- -

Neurofibromatosis, type 1

Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Jan 28, 2024	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Genome-Nilou Lab	Mar 15, 2022	- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:2

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Ambry Genetics	Sep 02, 2020	This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	curation	Sema4, Sema4	Feb 10, 2021	- -

Neurofibromatosis, type 1;C0349639:Juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia;C0553586:Café-au-lait macules with pulmonary stenosis;C1834235:Neurofibromatosis, familial spinal;C2931482:Neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndrome

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Oct 19, 2021

- -

Neurofibromatosis, familial spinal

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Jul 07, 2023

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.56

CADD

Benign

1.5

DANN

Benign

0.52

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over