rs777369021
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2_Supporting
The NM_001042492.3(NF1):c.1005T>C(p.Asn335=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000818 in 1,614,038 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000099 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000080 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
NF1
NM_001042492.3 synonymous
NM_001042492.3 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.0500
Genes affected
NF1 (HGNC:7765): (neurofibromin 1) This gene product appears to function as a negative regulator of the ras signal transduction pathway. Mutations in this gene have been linked to neurofibromatosis type 1, juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia and Watson syndrome. The mRNA for this gene is subject to RNA editing (CGA>UGA->Arg1306Term) resulting in premature translation termination. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have also been described for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.56).
BP6
Variant 17-31200538-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-31200538-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 184560.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr17-31200538-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.05 with no splicing effect.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 15 AD gene. Variant has AC lower than other variant known as pathogenic in the gene, so the strength is limited to Supporting.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NF1 | NM_001042492.3 | c.1005T>C | p.Asn335= | synonymous_variant | 9/58 | ENST00000358273.9 | NP_001035957.1 | |
NF1 | NM_000267.3 | c.1005T>C | p.Asn335= | synonymous_variant | 9/57 | NP_000258.1 | ||
NF1 | NM_001128147.3 | c.1005T>C | p.Asn335= | synonymous_variant | 9/15 | NP_001121619.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NF1 | ENST00000358273.9 | c.1005T>C | p.Asn335= | synonymous_variant | 9/58 | 1 | NM_001042492.3 | ENSP00000351015 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000985 AC: 15AN: 152212Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
15
AN:
152212
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000835 AC: 21AN: 251448Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000957 AC XY: 13AN XY: 135902
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
21
AN:
251448
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
13
AN XY:
135902
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000800 AC: 117AN: 1461826Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000784 AC XY: 57AN XY: 727216
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
117
AN:
1461826
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
57
AN XY:
727216
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000985 AC: 15AN: 152212Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000108 AC XY: 8AN XY: 74378
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
15
AN:
152212
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
8
AN XY:
74378
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 02, 2018 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Mar 14, 2019 | Variant summary: NF1 c.1005T>C alters a non-conserved nucleotide resulting in a synonymous change. 5/5 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 8.3e-05 in 277190 control chromosomes (gnomAD). This frequency is not significantly higher than expected for a pathogenic variant in NF1 causing Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (8.3e-05 vs 0.00021), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. This variant has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (Gasparini_1996, Bottillo_2007), without strong evidence for causality. These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Neurofibromatosis Type 1. Co-occurrences with other pathogenic variant have been reported (Bottillo_2007; NF1 c.476delC , p.Arg160Glyfs*5), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. In an in vitro mini gene assay, the variant was shown to abolish an expression of an alternative transcript lacking exon 7, however the clinical significance of this outcome is unclear (Bottillo_2007). Two clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as benign/likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Apr 09, 2020 | - - |
Neurofibromatosis, type 1 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 28, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Mar 15, 2022 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Sep 02, 2020 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Feb 10, 2021 | - - |
Neurofibromatosis, type 1;C0349639:Juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia;C0553586:Café-au-lait macules with pulmonary stenosis;C1834235:Neurofibromatosis, familial spinal;C2931482:Neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Oct 19, 2021 | - - |
Neurofibromatosis, familial spinal Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at