chr17-3636610-A-G

Position:

• chr17-3636610-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2 BP4_Strong

The ENST00000381870.8(CTNS):​c.-328A>G variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000303 in 204,452 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.00026 (0 hom., cov: 33)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.00042 (0 hom.)
• Consequence: CTNS ENST00000381870.8 5_prime_UTR
• Clinical Significance: Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:2
• Conservation: PhyloP100: -0.447

Genes affected

CTNS (HGNC:2518): (cystinosin, lysosomal cystine transporter) This gene encodes a seven-transmembrane domain protein that functions to transport cystine out of lysosomes. Its activity is driven by the H+ electrochemical gradient of the lysosomal membrane. Mutations in this gene cause cystinosis, a lysosomal storage disorder. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2009]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.

• PM2: Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage
• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.91).

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CTNS	NM_001031681.3	c.-328A>G		5_prime_UTR_variant	1/13		NP_001026851.2
CTNS	XM_006721463.4	c.-323A>G		5_prime_UTR_variant	1/13		XP_006721526.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CTNS	ENST00000381870.8	c.-328A>G		5_prime_UTR_variant	1/13	1		ENSP00000371294
CTNS	ENST00000673965.1	c.-323A>G		5_prime_UTR_variant	1/12			ENSP00000500995	P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000263 AC: 40 AN: 151966 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.000393

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00807

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.0000883

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000419 AC: 22 AN: 52486 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.000405 AC XY: 11 AN XY: 27166

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.000761

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00841

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.0000602

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.000290

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000263 AC: 40 AN: 151966 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000189 AC XY: 14 AN XY: 74222

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.000393

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00807

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.0000883

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00

Bravo AF: 0.000366

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2

Revision: criteria provided, single submitter

Submissions by phenotype

Ocular cystinosis Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Apr 27, 2017

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Nephropathic cystinosis Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Apr 27, 2017

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.91
CADD	Benign	2.4
DANN	Benign	0.47

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1012479993; hg19: chr17-3539904;