chr17-3656506-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 4 ACMG points: 5P and 1B. PM1PM2PP3BS1_Supporting

The NM_004937.3(CTNS):​c.481G>A​(p.Asp161Asn) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00003 in 1,598,070 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000029 ( 0 hom., cov: 19)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000030 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CTNS
NM_004937.3 missense

Scores

11
7
1

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 6.60
Variant links:
Genes affected
CTNS (HGNC:2518): (cystinosin, lysosomal cystine transporter) This gene encodes a seven-transmembrane domain protein that functions to transport cystine out of lysosomes. Its activity is driven by the H+ electrochemical gradient of the lysosomal membrane. Mutations in this gene cause cystinosis, a lysosomal storage disorder. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2009]
CTNS-AS1 (HGNC:56090): (CTNS antisense RNA 1)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 4 ACMG points.

PM1
In a domain PQ-loop 1 (size 66) in uniprot entity CTNS_HUMAN there are 5 pathogenic changes around while only 0 benign (100%) in NM_004937.3
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
PP3
MetaRNN computational evidence supports a deleterious effect, 0.838
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.0000301 (44/1460902) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.000882 (35/39670). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000652. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 32 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
CTNSNM_004937.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.481G>A p.Asp161Asn missense_variant 8/12 ENST00000046640.9 NP_004928.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CTNSENST00000046640.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.481G>A p.Asp161Asn missense_variant 8/121 NM_004937.3 ENSP00000046640 P1O60931-1
CTNS-AS1ENST00000575741.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.532+350C>T intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant 5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000292
AC:
4
AN:
137168
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
19
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000282
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000417
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000253
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000402
AC:
10
AN:
248790
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000519
AC XY:
7
AN XY:
134796
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000125
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000327
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000329
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00000890
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000301
AC:
44
AN:
1460902
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000440
AC XY:
32
AN XY:
726682
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000224
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000882
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000232
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000540
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000292
AC:
4
AN:
137168
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
19
AF XY:
0.0000152
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
65822
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000282
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000417
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000253
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000454
AC:
2
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.0000741
AC:
9

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Ocular cystinosis Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo ClinicJun 18, 2021- -
Nephropathic cystinosis Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
0.76
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
0.014
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.090
CADD
Pathogenic
30
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Pathogenic
0.99
D;.;.;.;.
Eigen
Pathogenic
0.73
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.62
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.94
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.97
D;D;.;D;T
M_CAP
Pathogenic
0.33
D
MetaRNN
Pathogenic
0.84
D;D;D;D;D
MetaSVM
Pathogenic
1.1
D
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
3.4
M;M;.;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D;D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.57
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
-4.8
D;D;.;.;.
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.79
Sift
Pathogenic
0.0
D;D;.;.;.
Sift4G
Pathogenic
0.0
D;D;.;D;D
Polyphen
1.0
D;D;.;.;.
Vest4
0.95
MVP
0.99
MPC
0.67
ClinPred
0.97
D
GERP RS
4.8
Varity_R
0.92
gMVP
0.91

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs371533565; hg19: chr17-3559800; API