chr17-3656590-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_004937.3(CTNS):​c.561+4C>T variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000351 in 1,611,828 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00038 ( 0 hom., cov: 28)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00035 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

CTNS
NM_004937.3 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.0002242
2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:4B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.82

Publications

1 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
CTNS (HGNC:2518): (cystinosin, lysosomal cystine transporter) This gene encodes a seven-transmembrane domain protein that functions to transport cystine out of lysosomes. Its activity is driven by the H+ electrochemical gradient of the lysosomal membrane. Mutations in this gene cause cystinosis, a lysosomal storage disorder. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2009]
CTNS-AS1 (HGNC:56090): (CTNS antisense RNA 1)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.82).
BP6
Variant 17-3656590-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-3656590-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 257156.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submission is: [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAdExome4 allele frequency = 0.000348 (508/1461426) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.000358 (12/33478). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000291. There are 2 homozygotes in GnomAdExome4. There are 217 alleles in the male GnomAdExome4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
CTNSNM_004937.3 linkc.561+4C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 8 of 11 ENST00000046640.9 NP_004928.2 O60931-1A0A0S2Z3K3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CTNSENST00000046640.9 linkc.561+4C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 8 of 11 1 NM_004937.3 ENSP00000046640.4 O60931-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000379
AC:
57
AN:
150286
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
28
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000270
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000666
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00211
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000340
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000319
AC:
80
AN:
250906
AF XY:
0.000317
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000248
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000868
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00189
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000247
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000327
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000348
AC:
508
AN:
1461426
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000298
AC XY:
217
AN XY:
727006
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000358
AC:
12
AN:
33478
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000671
AC:
3
AN:
44720
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26132
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000126
AC:
5
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000464
AC:
4
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00193
AC:
103
AN:
53248
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000318
AC:
354
AN:
1111734
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000447
AC:
27
AN:
60388
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.479
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
30
60
91
121
151
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000379
AC:
57
AN:
150402
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
28
AF XY:
0.000395
AC XY:
29
AN XY:
73426
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000270
AC:
11
AN:
40788
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000665
AC:
1
AN:
15028
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3456
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5016
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4706
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00211
AC:
22
AN:
10434
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000340
AC:
23
AN:
67704
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2072
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.493
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
2
4
7
9
11
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000371
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000261
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000109
EpiControl
AF:
0.000178

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:4Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Ocular cystinosis Uncertain:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not provided Uncertain:1
Jun 29, 2016
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nephropathic cystinosis Uncertain:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Cystinosis Uncertain:1
Apr 21, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:1
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Juvenile nephropathic cystinosis;C0950123:Inborn genetic diseases;C2931013:Ocular cystinosis Benign:1
Nov 16, 2024
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.82
CADD
Benign
0.37
DANN
Benign
0.77
PhyloP100
-1.8
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.00022
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.012
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs111256750; hg19: chr17-3559884; COSMIC: COSV50439899; COSMIC: COSV50439899; API