rs111256750
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_004937.3(CTNS):c.561+4C>T variant causes a splice donor region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000351 in 1,611,828 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00038 ( 0 hom., cov: 28)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00035 ( 2 hom. )
Consequence
CTNS
NM_004937.3 splice_donor_region, intron
NM_004937.3 splice_donor_region, intron
Scores
2
Splicing: ADA: 0.0002242
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -1.82
Genes affected
CTNS (HGNC:2518): (cystinosin, lysosomal cystine transporter) This gene encodes a seven-transmembrane domain protein that functions to transport cystine out of lysosomes. Its activity is driven by the H+ electrochemical gradient of the lysosomal membrane. Mutations in this gene cause cystinosis, a lysosomal storage disorder. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2009]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.82).
BP6
Variant 17-3656590-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-3656590-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 257156.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Uncertain_significance=3}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000348 (508/1461426) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.000358 (12/33478). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000291. There are 2 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 217 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTNS | NM_004937.3 | c.561+4C>T | splice_donor_region_variant, intron_variant | ENST00000046640.9 | NP_004928.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTNS | ENST00000046640.9 | c.561+4C>T | splice_donor_region_variant, intron_variant | 1 | NM_004937.3 | ENSP00000046640 | P1 | |||
CTNS-AS1 | ENST00000575741.1 | n.532+266G>A | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant | 5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000379 AC: 57AN: 150286Hom.: 0 Cov.: 28
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
57
AN:
150286
Hom.:
Cov.:
28
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000319 AC: 80AN: 250906Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000317 AC XY: 43AN XY: 135796
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
80
AN:
250906
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
43
AN XY:
135796
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000348 AC: 508AN: 1461426Hom.: 2 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000298 AC XY: 217AN XY: 727006
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
508
AN:
1461426
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
217
AN XY:
727006
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000379 AC: 57AN: 150402Hom.: 0 Cov.: 28 AF XY: 0.000395 AC XY: 29AN XY: 73426
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
57
AN:
150402
Hom.:
Cov.:
28
AF XY:
AC XY:
29
AN XY:
73426
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:4Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Ocular cystinosis Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jun 29, 2016 | - - |
Nephropathic cystinosis Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Cystinosis Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Apr 21, 2020 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Juvenile nephropathic cystinosis;C0950123:Inborn genetic diseases;C2931013:Ocular cystinosis Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 21, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at