rs111256750

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_004937.3(CTNS):​c.561+4C>T variant causes a splice donor region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000351 in 1,611,828 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00038 ( 0 hom., cov: 28)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00035 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

CTNS
NM_004937.3 splice_donor_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.0002242
2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:4B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.82
Variant links:
Genes affected
CTNS (HGNC:2518): (cystinosin, lysosomal cystine transporter) This gene encodes a seven-transmembrane domain protein that functions to transport cystine out of lysosomes. Its activity is driven by the H+ electrochemical gradient of the lysosomal membrane. Mutations in this gene cause cystinosis, a lysosomal storage disorder. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2009]
CTNS-AS1 (HGNC:56090): (CTNS antisense RNA 1)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.82).
BP6
Variant 17-3656590-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-3656590-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 257156.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Uncertain_significance=3}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000348 (508/1461426) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.000358 (12/33478). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000291. There are 2 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 217 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
CTNSNM_004937.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.561+4C>T splice_donor_region_variant, intron_variant ENST00000046640.9 NP_004928.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CTNSENST00000046640.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.561+4C>T splice_donor_region_variant, intron_variant 1 NM_004937.3 ENSP00000046640 P1O60931-1
CTNS-AS1ENST00000575741.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.532+266G>A intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant 5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000379
AC:
57
AN:
150286
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
28
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000270
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000666
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00211
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000340
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000319
AC:
80
AN:
250906
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000317
AC XY:
43
AN XY:
135796
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000248
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000868
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00189
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000247
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000327
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000348
AC:
508
AN:
1461426
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000298
AC XY:
217
AN XY:
727006
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000358
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000671
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000126
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000464
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00193
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000318
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000447
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000379
AC:
57
AN:
150402
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
28
AF XY:
0.000395
AC XY:
29
AN XY:
73426
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000270
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0000665
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00211
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000340
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000371
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000261
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000109
EpiControl
AF:
0.000178

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:4Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Ocular cystinosis Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Jun 29, 2016- -
Nephropathic cystinosis Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Cystinosis Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Apr 21, 2020- -
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Juvenile nephropathic cystinosis;C0950123:Inborn genetic diseases;C2931013:Ocular cystinosis Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 21, 2024- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.82
CADD
Benign
0.37
DANN
Benign
0.77
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.00022
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.012
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs111256750; hg19: chr17-3559884; COSMIC: COSV50439899; COSMIC: COSV50439899; API