chr17-43099786-T-C
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_007294.4(BRCA1):c.536A>G(p.Tyr179Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000337 in 1,608,112 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 8 homozygotes. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00035 ( 1 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00034 ( 7 hom. )
Consequence
BRCA1
NM_007294.4 missense
NM_007294.4 missense
Scores
5
9
5
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 3.36
Genes affected
BRCA1 (HGNC:1100): (BRCA1 DNA repair associated) This gene encodes a 190 kD nuclear phosphoprotein that plays a role in maintaining genomic stability, and it also acts as a tumor suppressor. The BRCA1 gene contains 22 exons spanning about 110 kb of DNA. The encoded protein combines with other tumor suppressors, DNA damage sensors, and signal transducers to form a large multi-subunit protein complex known as the BRCA1-associated genome surveillance complex (BASC). This gene product associates with RNA polymerase II, and through the C-terminal domain, also interacts with histone deacetylase complexes. This protein thus plays a role in transcription, DNA repair of double-stranded breaks, and recombination. Mutations in this gene are responsible for approximately 40% of inherited breast cancers and more than 80% of inherited breast and ovarian cancers. Alternative splicing plays a role in modulating the subcellular localization and physiological function of this gene. Many alternatively spliced transcript variants, some of which are disease-associated mutations, have been described for this gene, but the full-length natures of only some of these variants has been described. A related pseudogene, which is also located on chromosome 17, has been identified. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.
BP6
Variant 17-43099786-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-43099786-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 37661.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr17-43099786-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr17-43099786-T-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr17-43099786-T-C is described in Lovd as [Pathogenic].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population mid. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000336 (489/1455778) while in subpopulation MID AF= 0.0181 (104/5754). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0153. There are 7 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 256 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 30. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 7 AD,AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA1 | NM_007294.4 | c.536A>G | p.Tyr179Cys | missense_variant | 7/23 | ENST00000357654.9 | NP_009225.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA1 | ENST00000357654.9 | c.536A>G | p.Tyr179Cys | missense_variant | 7/23 | 1 | NM_007294.4 | ENSP00000350283.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000348 AC: 53AN: 152216Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
53
AN:
152216
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000258 AC: 65AN: 251464Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000338 AC XY: 46AN XY: 135898
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
65
AN:
251464
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
46
AN XY:
135898
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000336 AC: 489AN: 1455778Hom.: 7 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000353 AC XY: 256AN XY: 724678
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
489
AN:
1455778
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
256
AN XY:
724678
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000348 AC: 53AN: 152334Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000403 AC XY: 30AN XY: 74490
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
53
AN:
152334
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
30
AN XY:
74490
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
2
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
2
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
3
ExAC
AF:
AC:
33
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:36
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Uncertain:1Benign:11
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Michigan Medical Genetics Laboratories, University of Michigan | Apr 21, 2016 | - - |
Benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) | Aug 10, 2015 | IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis, thresholds for class as per Plon et al. 2008 (PMID: 18951446). Class 1 based on posterior probability = 0.00000000000173 - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | literature only | Counsyl | Apr 07, 2014 | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA1) | May 29, 2002 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Nov 19, 2018 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Sep 01, 2015 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | BRCAlab, Lund University | Mar 02, 2020 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP) | May 01, 2012 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genomic Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences | May 03, 2020 | - - |
not specified Benign:10
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | research | Research Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto | Jan 31, 2014 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Jan 19, 2022 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Jun 23, 2016 | Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: ClinVar: 6 B/LB, including expert panel - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 22, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Aug 04, 2015 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
not provided Benign:6
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | May 16, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Nov 01, 2024 | BRCA1: BP1, BS3:Moderate, BS1 - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Sep 18, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Sep 03, 2022 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | Aug 01, 2017 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | True Health Diagnostics | Apr 05, 2018 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Dec 15, 2014 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Jun 25, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 18, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genomic Diagnostic Laboratory, Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia | Sep 02, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C. | Apr 07, 2022 | - - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Feb 22, 2023 | - - |
BRCA1-related cancer predisposition Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Sep 27, 2024 | - - |
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The p.Tyr179Cys variant has been identified in 11 of 5342 proband chromosomes (frequency 0.002) in individuals with breast or ovarian cancers (Akbari 2011, Augello 2006, Caligo 2008, Diez 2003, Jalkh 2012, Russo 2007, Solano 2012) and was absent in 400 control chromosomes from these studies. Myriad reports this variant as a polymorphism, and Exome Server Project reports a frequency of 0.0003 in European American alleles, and 0.0002 in African American alleles. This variant has been also been reported in dbSNP (ID: rs56187033) “with non-pathogenic allele”, in the BIC database 54X as a variant of unknown clinical importance, and in UMD 27X as a neutral variant which co-occurred with pathogenic mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 four times (BRCA1 c.2043dup (p.Asn682X), BRCA1 c.191G>A (p.Cys64Tyr), BRCA2 c.6082_6086delGAAGA (p.Glu2028LysfsX19), BRCA2 c.5909C>A (p.Ser1970X)). The p.Tyr179 residue is conserved in mammals; however, computational analyses (PolyPhen2, SIFT, AlignGVGD) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein, and this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. Functional studies on the p.Tyr179Cys variant have suggested that it may have a deleterious effect on BRCA1 function, in assays evaluating its effect in homologous repair (Caligo 2008, Di Cecco 2009), non-homologous end-joining (Guidugli 2011), interaction of BRCA1 with Filamin A (Velkova 2010), and accumulation of BRCA1 at double-strand breaks (Wei 2008). Many studies have identified the p.Tyr179Cys variant co-occurring with two other BRCA1 variants, p.Phe486Lys and p.Asn550His, in individuals with breast or ovarian cancers (Augello 2006, Caligo 2008, Diez 2003, Jalkh 2012), suggesting that together they constitute a rare haplotype (Tavtigian 2006). Furthermore, Augello (2006) identified these three mutations in three members of one family indicating that they exist in cis, and suggests that the presence of the three variants might produce an effect on the conformation of the protein and, consequently, on its function. In summary, this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Pathogenic
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
CADD
Uncertain
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Benign
.;T;.;.;.;.;.;T;.;T;.;T;T;.;T;T
Eigen
Uncertain
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D
M_CAP
Pathogenic
D
MetaRNN
Uncertain
D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D
MetaSVM
Pathogenic
D
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
M;M;M;M;.;M;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N;N;N;N;N;N;N;D;N;D;N;.;N;N;N;D
REVEL
Pathogenic
Sift
Uncertain
D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;.;D;D;D;D
Sift4G
Benign
T;D;D;T;D;T;.;.;T;.;D;.;D;.;D;.
Polyphen
1.0, 1.0
.;D;.;.;.;D;.;D;.;.;D;.;.;.;.;.
Vest4
MVP
MPC
0.47
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at