chr17-50196376-C-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000088.4(COL1A1):​c.904-9G>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00927 in 1,613,882 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 90 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). There are indicators that this mutation may affect the branch point..

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0065 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0096 ( 89 hom. )

Consequence

COL1A1
NM_000088.4 intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.00002219
2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:15

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.555
Variant links:
Genes affected
COL1A1 (HGNC:2197): (collagen type I alpha 1 chain) This gene encodes the pro-alpha1 chains of type I collagen whose triple helix comprises two alpha1 chains and one alpha2 chain. Type I is a fibril-forming collagen found in most connective tissues and is abundant in bone, cornea, dermis and tendon. Mutations in this gene are associated with osteogenesis imperfecta types I-IV, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type VIIA, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Classical type, Caffey Disease and idiopathic osteoporosis. Reciprocal translocations between chromosomes 17 and 22, where this gene and the gene for platelet-derived growth factor beta are located, are associated with a particular type of skin tumor called dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, resulting from unregulated expression of the growth factor. Two transcripts, resulting from the use of alternate polyadenylation signals, have been identified for this gene. [provided by R. Dalgleish, Feb 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
This place is a probable branch point but likely benign (scored 1 / 10). Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.8).
BP6
Variant 17-50196376-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-50196376-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 35930.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr17-50196376-C-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00655 (997/152282) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.011 (746/68000). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0103. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 488 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 997 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
COL1A1NM_000088.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.904-9G>T intron_variant ENST00000225964.10 NP_000079.2 P02452
COL1A1XM_011524341.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.904-9G>T intron_variant XP_011522643.1
COL1A1XM_005257058.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.904-9G>T intron_variant XP_005257115.2
COL1A1XM_005257059.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.904-9G>T intron_variant XP_005257116.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
COL1A1ENST00000225964.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.904-9G>T intron_variant 1 NM_000088.4 ENSP00000225964.6 P02452
COL1A1ENST00000485870.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.220G>T non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 1/23

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00657
AC:
1000
AN:
152164
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00154
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00334
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00202
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00269
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0101
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0127
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0110
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00335
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00751
AC:
1879
AN:
250216
Hom.:
19
AF XY:
0.00783
AC XY:
1059
AN XY:
135318
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00167
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00244
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00219
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000546
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00347
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0108
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0121
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00671
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00955
AC:
13965
AN:
1461600
Hom.:
89
Cov.:
37
AF XY:
0.00944
AC XY:
6867
AN XY:
727062
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00131
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00240
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00203
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000504
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00347
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0109
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0111
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00816
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00655
AC:
997
AN:
152282
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00655
AC XY:
488
AN XY:
74460
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00154
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00327
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00202
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00249
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0101
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0110
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00331
Alfa
AF:
0.00869
Hom.:
5
Bravo
AF:
0.00602

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:15
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Aug 05, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpSep 06, 2018Variant summary: COL1A1 c.904-9G>T is located at a position not widely known to affect splicing. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0077 in 276078 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.012 within the Non-Finnish European subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 14 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency within Non-Finnish European control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 426.66 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in COL1A1 causing Osteogenesis Imperfecta phenotype (2.8e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of Non-Finnish European origin. Four clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as benign/likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxOct 05, 2016This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
not provided Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenNov 01, 2024COL1A1: BP4, BS1, BS2 -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsApr 10, 2018- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesNov 21, 2023- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Osteogenesis imperfecta Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick ChildrenJul 16, 2022- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick ChildrenJul 07, 2022- -
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, arthrochalasia type Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Infantile cortical hyperostosis Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Connective tissue disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Human Genetics, Inc, Center for Human Genetics, IncNov 01, 2016- -
Osteogenesis imperfecta type I Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 30, 2024- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.80
CADD
Benign
11
DANN
Benign
0.69
BranchPoint Hunter
1.0

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.000022
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.0
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs141726413; hg19: chr17-48273737; COSMIC: COSV56806369; COSMIC: COSV56806369; API