rs141726413

Positions:

• chr17-50196376-C-A
• chr17-50196376-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_Strong BP6_Very_Strong BS1 BS2

The NM_000088.4(COL1A1):​c.904-9G>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00927 in 1,613,882 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 90 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). There are indicators that this mutation may affect the branch point..

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.0065 (1 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.0096 (89 hom.)
• Consequence: COL1A1 NM_000088.4 intron
• Scores: Splicing: ADA: 0.00002219
• Clinical Significance: Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:15
• Conservation: PhyloP100: 0.555

Genes affected

COL1A1 (HGNC:2197): (collagen type I alpha 1 chain) This gene encodes the pro-alpha1 chains of type I collagen whose triple helix comprises two alpha1 chains and one alpha2 chain. Type I is a fibril-forming collagen found in most connective tissues and is abundant in bone, cornea, dermis and tendon. Mutations in this gene are associated with osteogenesis imperfecta types I-IV, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type VIIA, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Classical type, Caffey Disease and idiopathic osteoporosis. Reciprocal translocations between chromosomes 17 and 22, where this gene and the gene for platelet-derived growth factor beta are located, are associated with a particular type of skin tumor called dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, resulting from unregulated expression of the growth factor. Two transcripts, resulting from the use of alternate polyadenylation signals, have been identified for this gene. [provided by R. Dalgleish, Feb 2008]

COL1A1 (HGNC:):

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

• BP4: This place is a probable branch point but likely benign (scored 1 / 10). Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.8).
• BP6: Variant 17-50196376-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-50196376-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 35930.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr17-50196376-C-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00655 (997/152282) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.011 (746/68000). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0103. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 488 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
• BS2: High AC in GnomAd4 at 997 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
COL1A1	NM_000088.4	c.904-9G>T		intron_variant		ENST00000225964.10	NP_000079.2
COL1A1	XM_011524341.2	c.904-9G>T		intron_variant			XP_011522643.1
COL1A1	XM_005257058.5	c.904-9G>T		intron_variant			XP_005257115.2
COL1A1	XM_005257059.5	c.904-9G>T		intron_variant			XP_005257116.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
COL1A1	ENST00000225964.10	c.904-9G>T		intron_variant		1	NM_000088.4	ENSP00000225964.6
COL1A1	ENST00000485870.1	n.220G>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	1/2	3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00657 AC: 1000 AN: 152164 Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.00154

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.00334

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00202

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00269

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.0101

Gnomad MID AF: 0.0127

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.0110

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00335

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00751 AC: 1879 AN: 250216 Hom.: 19 AF XY: 0.00783 AC XY: 1059 AN XY: 135318

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.00167

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.00244

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00219

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.0000546

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.00347

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.0108

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.0121

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.00671

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00955 AC: 13965 AN: 1461600 Hom.: 89 Cov.: 37 AF XY: 0.00944 AC XY: 6867 AN XY: 727062

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.00131

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.00240

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00203

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.0000504

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.00347

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.0109

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.0111

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.00816

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00655 AC: 997 AN: 152282 Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00655 AC XY: 488 AN XY: 74460

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.00154

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.00327

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00202

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.00249

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.0101

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.0110

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00331

Alfa AF: 0.00869 Hom.: 5

Bravo AF: 0.00602

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:15

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)	Aug 05, 2015	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp	Sep 06, 2018	Variant summary: COL1A1 c.904-9G>T is located at a position not widely known to affect splicing. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0077 in 276078 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.012 within the Non-Finnish European subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 14 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency within Non-Finnish European control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 426.66 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in COL1A1 causing Osteogenesis Imperfecta phenotype (2.8e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of Non-Finnish European origin. Four clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as benign/likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences	-	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Oct 05, 2016	This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

not provided Benign:4

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen	Nov 01, 2024	COL1A1: BP4, BS1, BS2 -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Athena Diagnostics	Apr 10, 2018	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories	Nov 21, 2023	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	not provided	Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics	-	- -

Osteogenesis imperfecta Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children	Jul 16, 2022	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 13, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children

Jul 07, 2022

- -

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, arthrochalasia type Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Infantile cortical hyperostosis Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Connective tissue disorder Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Center for Human Genetics, Inc, Center for Human Genetics, Inc

Nov 01, 2016

- -

Osteogenesis imperfecta type I Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Jan 30, 2024

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.80
CADD	Benign	11
DANN	Benign	0.69
BranchPoint Hunter		1.0

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA	Benign	0.000022
dbscSNV1_RF	Benign	0.0
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs141726413; hg19: chr17-48273737; COSMIC: COSV56806369; COSMIC: COSV56806369;