chr17-58692616-T-G
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 2P and 6B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6_Moderate
The NM_058216.3(RAD51C):c.-28T>G variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000137 in 1,460,924 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★).
Frequency
Genomes: not found (cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000014 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
RAD51C
NM_058216.3 5_prime_UTR
NM_058216.3 5_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -7.60
Genes affected
RAD51C (HGNC:9820): (RAD51 paralog C) This gene is a member of the RAD51 family. RAD51 family members are highly similar to bacterial RecA and Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad51 and are known to be involved in the homologous recombination and repair of DNA. This protein can interact with other RAD51 paralogs and is reported to be important for Holliday junction resolution. Mutations in this gene are associated with Fanconi anemia-like syndrome. This gene is one of four localized to a region of chromosome 17q23 where amplification occurs frequently in breast tumors. Overexpression of the four genes during amplification has been observed and suggests a possible role in tumor progression. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2013]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.79).
BP6
Variant 17-58692616-T-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-58692616-T-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 385254.Status of the report is criteria_provided_single_submitter, 1 stars.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RAD51C | NM_058216.3 | c.-28T>G | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/9 | ENST00000337432.9 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RAD51C | ENST00000337432.9 | c.-28T>G | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/9 | 1 | NM_058216.3 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000120 AC: 3AN: 250430Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 135568
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
3
AN:
250430
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
135568
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000137 AC: 2AN: 1460924Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 726700
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
1460924
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
726700
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
33
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 01, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at