chr17-58694923-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2
The NM_058216.3(RAD51C):c.146-8A>G variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000727 in 1,606,366 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 14 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_058216.3 splice_region, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RAD51C | NM_058216.3 | c.146-8A>G | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | ENST00000337432.9 | NP_478123.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RAD51C | ENST00000337432.9 | c.146-8A>G | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | 1 | NM_058216.3 | ENSP00000336701.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000729 AC: 111AN: 152168Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00128 AC: 320AN: 250140Hom.: 3 AF XY: 0.00122 AC XY: 165AN XY: 135666
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000727 AC: 1057AN: 1454198Hom.: 13 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000722 AC XY: 523AN XY: 724002
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000729 AC: 111AN: 152168Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000726 AC XY: 54AN XY: 74330
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:5
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 01, 2013 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | curation | Leiden Open Variation Database | Nov 02, 2014 | Curator: Arleen D. Auerbach. Submitter to LOVD: Christine Rappaport. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Aug 13, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Nov 04, 2021 | - - |
Fanconi anemia complementation group O Uncertain:1Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Jun 09, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 3 Uncertain:1Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Apr 05, 2023 | This variant is considered benign. This variant is intronic and is not expected to impact mRNA splicing. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Jun 09, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | May 01, 2024 | RAD51C: BP4, BS1 - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Aug 14, 2023 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Jan 15, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | True Health Diagnostics | Sep 29, 2017 | - - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Jun 04, 2021 | - - |
Fanconi anemia complementation group O;C3150659:Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 3 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Jan 05, 2017 | - - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C. | Aug 18, 2022 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at