chr17-61847144-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2

The NM_032043.3(BRIP1):​c.584T>C​(p.Leu195Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00224 in 1,613,712 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 17/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. L195R) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0019 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0023 ( 6 hom. )

Consequence

BRIP1
NM_032043.3 missense

Scores

18

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:26O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.364

Publications

19 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRIP1 (HGNC:20473): (BRCA1 interacting helicase 1) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the RecQ DEAH helicase family and interacts with the BRCT repeats of breast cancer, type 1 (BRCA1). The bound complex is important in the normal double-strand break repair function of breast cancer, type 1 (BRCA1). This gene may be a target of germline cancer-inducing mutations. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
BRIP1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • familial ovarian cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • Fanconi anemia
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Illumina
  • Fanconi anemia complementation group J
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, ClinGen, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • hereditary breast carcinoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, LIMITED, NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen, Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • colorectal adenoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.004298687).
BP6
Variant 17-61847144-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-61847144-A-G is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 128193.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 6 AD,AR gene

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_032043.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
BRIP1
NM_032043.3
MANE Select
c.584T>Cp.Leu195Pro
missense
Exon 6 of 20NP_114432.2

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
BRIP1
ENST00000259008.7
TSL:1 MANE Select
c.584T>Cp.Leu195Pro
missense
Exon 6 of 20ENSP00000259008.2
BRIP1
ENST00000682453.1
c.584T>Cp.Leu195Pro
missense
Exon 7 of 21ENSP00000506943.1
BRIP1
ENST00000683039.1
c.584T>Cp.Leu195Pro
missense
Exon 7 of 21ENSP00000508303.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00189
AC:
287
AN:
152188
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000507
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000621
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00923
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00207
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00191
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00194
AC:
487
AN:
251340
AF XY:
0.00200
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000492
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000723
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00911
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00202
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00228
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00228
AC:
3328
AN:
1461406
Hom.:
6
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00219
AC XY:
1589
AN XY:
727042
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000329
AC:
11
AN:
33458
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000805
AC:
36
AN:
44722
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26122
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39650
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000417
AC:
36
AN:
86254
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00800
AC:
427
AN:
53400
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5762
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00242
AC:
2695
AN:
1111668
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00204
AC:
123
AN:
60370
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.463
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
169
338
507
676
845
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
110
220
330
440
550
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00188
AC:
287
AN:
152306
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00203
AC XY:
151
AN XY:
74478
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000505
AC:
21
AN:
41562
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00131
AC:
20
AN:
15302
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5188
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000621
AC:
3
AN:
4828
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00923
AC:
98
AN:
10618
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00207
AC:
141
AN:
68016
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00189
AC:
4
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.505
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
13
26
39
52
65
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00154
Hom.:
2
Bravo
AF:
0.00120
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00216
AC:
8
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00234
AC:
9
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000454
AC:
2
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00186
AC:
16
ExAC
AF:
0.00160
AC:
194
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3474
EpiCase
AF:
0.00202
EpiControl
AF:
0.00243

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:26Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:7
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

The BRIP1 p.Leu195Pro variant was identified in 21 of 13772 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.002) from individuals or families with prostate cancer, breast cancer, ovarian cancer, and Lynch syndrome and was present in 19 of 21561 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.0009) from healthy individuals (Bodian 2014, Kote-Jarai 2009, Kuusisto 2011, Lewis 2005, Rafnar 2011, Ramus 2015, Ray 2009, Rutter 2003, Seal 2006, Yurgelun 2015). The variant was also identified in the following databases: dbSNP (ID: rs4988347) as "With Likely benign allele", ClinVar (4x benign, 3x likely benign), Clinvitae, and the Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database (6x, likely neutral). The variant was not identified in Cosmic or the MutDB database. The variant was identified in control databases in 537 of 277082 chromosomes (2 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.002 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). It was observed in the following populations: African in 8 of 24028 chromosomes (freq: 0.0003), Other in 10 of 6464 chromosomes (freq: 0.002), Latino in 24 of 34414 chromosomes (freq: 0.0007), European in 255 of 126622 chromosomes (freq: 0.002), Finnish in 226 of 25772 chromosomes (freq: 0.009), and South Asian in 14 of 30782 chromosomes (freq: 0.0005). The variant was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish or East Asian populations. A study by Lewis 2005 utilizing in silico bioinformatic tools predicted this variant may affect mRNA folding and exonic splicing enhancers. However, the same study showed that the variant did not segregate with disease in a family with breast cancer (Lewis 2005). The p.Leu195 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign.

Feb 08, 2016
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Sep 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

BRIP1: BP4, BS1, BS2

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:5
Sep 19, 2024
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Dec 08, 2017
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Dec 23, 2022
Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Mar 12, 2021
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

Apr 22, 2025
Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, Catalan Institute of Oncology
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

BS2_Supporting, BP4_Moderate c.584T>C, located in exon 6 of the BRIP1 gene, is predicted to result in the substitution of Leucine by Proline at codon 195, p.(Leu195Pro). This variant is found in 534/282724 alleles (2 homozygotes) at a frequency of 0.196% in the gnomAD v2.1.1 database, non-cancer dataset (BS2_supporting). The SpliceAI algorithm predicts no significant impact on splicing. The REVEL meta-predictor score for this variant (0.103) suggests that it does not affect the protein function according Pejaver 2022 thresholds (PMID: 36413997) (BP4_moderate). To our knowledge, neither relevant clinical data nor well-stablished functional studies have been reported for this variant. It has been reported in the ClinVar database (11x benign, 8x likely benign). Based on the currently available information, c.584T>C is classified as a likely benign variant according to ACMG guidelines.

not specified Benign:4Other:1
Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Sep 19, 2013
ITMI
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:reference population

Oct 01, 2021
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Dec 21, 2017
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

Mar 11, 2021
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Fanconi anemia complementation group J Benign:3
Jan 29, 2019
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign.

Jul 05, 2016
Counsyl
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com.

Familial cancer of breast Benign:3
Aug 21, 2024
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign. Homozygosity for this variant has been confirmed in one or more individuals lacking clinical features consistent with gene-specific recessive disease, indicating that this variant is unlikely to be pathogenic.

Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

May 28, 2019
Mendelics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Mar 03, 2023
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Familial cancer of breast;C1836860:Fanconi anemia complementation group J Benign:1
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Ovarian cancer Benign:1
Jul 05, 2016
Counsyl
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com.

BRIP1-related disorder Benign:1
Feb 05, 2020
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications).

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.056
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.51
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.51
CADD
Benign
5.2
DANN
Benign
0.23
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.067
T
Eigen
Benign
-1.1
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.0
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.13
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.46
T
M_CAP
Benign
0.033
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0043
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.92
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.75
N
PhyloP100
0.36
PrimateAI
Benign
0.35
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.10
N
REVEL
Benign
0.10
Sift
Benign
0.32
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.39
T
Polyphen
0.0
B
Vest4
0.13
MVP
0.41
MPC
0.26
ClinPred
0.0012
T
GERP RS
-0.011
PromoterAI
0.017
Neutral
Varity_R
0.032
gMVP
0.47
Mutation Taster
=85/15
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs4988347; hg19: chr17-59924505; COSMIC: COSV99034601; API