chr17-61849206-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_032043.3(BRIP1):c.430G>A(p.Ala144Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000424 in 1,612,758 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_032043.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000803 AC: 122AN: 151984Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00152 AC: 382AN: 251264Hom.: 2 AF XY: 0.00149 AC XY: 202AN XY: 135796
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000385 AC: 563AN: 1460656Hom.: 2 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000403 AC XY: 293AN XY: 726690
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000796 AC: 121AN: 152102Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000995 AC XY: 74AN XY: 74352
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:6Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Mar 11, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 31, 2013 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | curation | Leiden Open Variation Database | Aug 13, 2019 | Curator: Arleen D. Auerbach. Submitter to LOVD: Yukihide Momozawa. - |
not provided, no classification provided | reference population | ITMI | Sep 19, 2013 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute | - | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | True Health Diagnostics | Oct 26, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Apr 22, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Aug 08, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | May 01, 2021 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jul 01, 2016 | Variant summary: The BRIP1 c.430G>A (p.Ala144Thr) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. 3/4 in silico tools predict a damaging outcome for this variant (SNPs&GO not captured due to low reliability index). This variant was found in 164/121364 control chromosomes (2 homozygotes) at a frequency of 0.0013513, which is approximately 22 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic BRIP1 variant (0.0000625), suggesting this variant is likely a benign polymorphism. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as benign. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Sep 04, 2019 | - - |
Carcinoma of colon Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The BRIP1 p.Ala144Thr variant was identified in 7 of 3854 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.002) from Australian, Korean, Chinese and America individuals or families with suspected Lynch Syndrome, or BRCA1/2 negative familial breast cancer, but was not identified in 186 control chromosomes (Yurgelun 2015, Lewis 2005, Kim 2016 , Cao 2009). In one study, the variant cooccurred with BRIP1 c.3401delC, and both variants were not found to segregate with breast cancer, being inherited from the father of the index case who had no personal or family history of breast cancer, and not from the affected mother with a strong family history (Lewis 2005 ). The variant was identified in ClinVar (classified as benign by GeneDx, Ambry Genetics, Invitae, Counsyl; likely benign by Illumina; and classification not provided by ITMI), Clinvitae ( classified as benign 5X, and likely benign 1X), Cosmic (1X in a bladder carcinoma, confirmed as somatic), and the Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database (3X); and was not identified in MutDB. The variant was also identified in control databases in 390 (2 homozygous) of 277018 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.001, increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Consortium Feb 27, 2017), identified in the following population at a frequency greater than 1%: East Asian in 361 of 18862 chromosomes (freq: 0.019). The p.Ala144Thr residue is conserved in in mammals but not in more distantly related organisms however computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. - |
Familial cancer of breast;C1836860:Fanconi anemia complementation group J Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Fanconi anemia complementation group J Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Aug 15, 2016 | - - |
Familial cancer of breast Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Mar 01, 2023 | This variant is considered likely benign. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. - |
Ovarian neoplasm Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Aug 15, 2016 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at