chr17-80210959-G-A
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points: 0P and 11B. BP4_ModerateBP6BS1BS2
The NM_000199.5(SGSH):c.1002C>T(p.Ala334=) variant causes a synonymous change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000888 in 1,602,278 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 16 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0011 ( 2 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00087 ( 14 hom. )
Consequence
SGSH
NM_000199.5 synonymous
NM_000199.5 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 5.30
Genes affected
SGSH (HGNC:10818): (N-sulfoglucosamine sulfohydrolase) This gene encodes the enzyme sulfamidase; one of several enzymes involved in the lysosomal degradation of heparan sulfate. Mutations in this gene are associated with the lysosomal storage disease mucopolysaccaridosis IIIA, also known as Sanfilippo syndrome A, which results from impaired degradation of heparan sulfate. Transcripts of varying sizes have been reported but their biological validity has not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2017]
CARD14 (HGNC:16446): (caspase recruitment domain family member 14) This gene encodes a caspase recruitment domain-containing protein that is a member of the membrane-associated guanylate kinase (MAGUK) family of proteins. Members of this protein family are scaffold proteins that are involved in a diverse array of cellular processes including cellular adhesion, signal transduction and cell polarity control. This protein has been shown to specifically interact with BCL10, a protein known to function as a positive regulator of cell apoptosis and NF-kappaB activation. Alternate splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2012]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.44).
BP6
Variant 17-80210959-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-80210959-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 255512.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=1}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00108 (164/152316) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.0017 (26/15296). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00119. There are 2 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 85 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGSH | NM_000199.5 | c.1002C>T | p.Ala334= | synonymous_variant | 8/8 | ENST00000326317.11 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGSH | ENST00000326317.11 | c.1002C>T | p.Ala334= | synonymous_variant | 8/8 | 1 | NM_000199.5 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00108 AC: 164AN: 152198Hom.: 2 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
164
AN:
152198
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00157 AC: 379AN: 240918Hom.: 5 AF XY: 0.00141 AC XY: 185AN XY: 131210
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
379
AN:
240918
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
185
AN XY:
131210
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000868 AC: 1259AN: 1449962Hom.: 14 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.000854 AC XY: 616AN XY: 721610
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1259
AN:
1449962
Hom.:
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
AC XY:
616
AN XY:
721610
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00108 AC: 164AN: 152316Hom.: 2 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00114 AC XY: 85AN XY: 74484
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
164
AN:
152316
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
85
AN XY:
74484
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Mucopolysaccharidosis, MPS-III-A Uncertain:1Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Nov 07, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 30, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | May 20, 2016 | - - |
SGSH-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Dec 24, 2020 | This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at