rs145596938

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points: 0P and 11B. BP4_ModerateBP6BS1BS2

The NM_000199.5(SGSH):​c.1002C>T​(p.Ala334=) variant causes a synonymous change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000888 in 1,602,278 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 16 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0011 ( 2 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00087 ( 14 hom. )

Consequence

SGSH
NM_000199.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.30
Variant links:
Genes affected
SGSH (HGNC:10818): (N-sulfoglucosamine sulfohydrolase) This gene encodes the enzyme sulfamidase; one of several enzymes involved in the lysosomal degradation of heparan sulfate. Mutations in this gene are associated with the lysosomal storage disease mucopolysaccaridosis IIIA, also known as Sanfilippo syndrome A, which results from impaired degradation of heparan sulfate. Transcripts of varying sizes have been reported but their biological validity has not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2017]
CARD14 (HGNC:16446): (caspase recruitment domain family member 14) This gene encodes a caspase recruitment domain-containing protein that is a member of the membrane-associated guanylate kinase (MAGUK) family of proteins. Members of this protein family are scaffold proteins that are involved in a diverse array of cellular processes including cellular adhesion, signal transduction and cell polarity control. This protein has been shown to specifically interact with BCL10, a protein known to function as a positive regulator of cell apoptosis and NF-kappaB activation. Alternate splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2012]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.44).
BP6
Variant 17-80210959-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-80210959-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 255512.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=1}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00108 (164/152316) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.0017 (26/15296). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00119. There are 2 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 85 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
SGSHNM_000199.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.1002C>T p.Ala334= synonymous_variant 8/8 ENST00000326317.11

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
SGSHENST00000326317.11 linkuse as main transcriptc.1002C>T p.Ala334= synonymous_variant 8/81 NM_000199.5 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00108
AC:
164
AN:
152198
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000482
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00170
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0305
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00633
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000367
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00144
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00157
AC:
379
AN:
240918
Hom.:
5
AF XY:
0.00141
AC XY:
185
AN XY:
131210
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000667
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0266
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000599
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00381
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000868
AC:
1259
AN:
1449962
Hom.:
14
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.000854
AC XY:
616
AN XY:
721610
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000597
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000738
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0265
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000337
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00254
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00108
AC:
164
AN:
152316
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00114
AC XY:
85
AN XY:
74484
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000481
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00170
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0305
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000367
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00142
Alfa
AF:
0.00500
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00116
EpiCase
AF:
0.000436
EpiControl
AF:
0.000356

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Mucopolysaccharidosis, MPS-III-A Uncertain:1Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabNov 07, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 30, 2024- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Sep 16, 2020- -
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)May 20, 2016- -
SGSH-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesDec 24, 2020This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.44
CADD
Benign
8.3
DANN
Benign
0.86
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs145596938; hg19: chr17-78184758; API