chr19-10718127-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 0P and 2B. BP4BS1_Supporting
The NM_001005361.3(DNM2):c.-116C>T variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000113 in 1,172,068 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000046 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00012 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
DNM2
NM_001005361.3 5_prime_UTR
NM_001005361.3 5_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.330
Genes affected
DNM2 (HGNC:2974): (dynamin 2) Dynamins represent one of the subfamilies of GTP-binding proteins. These proteins share considerable sequence similarity over the N-terminal portion of the molecule, which contains the GTPase domain. Dynamins are associated with microtubules. They have been implicated in cell processes such as endocytosis and cell motility, and in alterations of the membrane that accompany certain activities such as bone resorption by osteoclasts. Dynamins bind many proteins that bind actin and other cytoskeletal proteins. Dynamins can also self-assemble, a process that stimulates GTPase activity. Five alternatively spliced transcripts encoding different proteins have been described. Additional alternatively spliced transcripts may exist, but their full-length nature has not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2010]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.16).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000123 (125/1019950) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.00482 (115/23844). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00411. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 56 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 16. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNM2 | NM_001005361.3 | c.-116C>T | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/21 | ENST00000389253.9 | NP_001005361.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNM2 | ENST00000389253.9 | c.-116C>T | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/21 | 5 | NM_001005361.3 | ENSP00000373905.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000460 AC: 7AN: 152010Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
7
AN:
152010
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000123 AC: 125AN: 1019950Hom.: 0 Cov.: 16 AF XY: 0.000115 AC XY: 56AN XY: 488406
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
125
AN:
1019950
Hom.:
Cov.:
16
AF XY:
AC XY:
56
AN XY:
488406
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000460 AC: 7AN: 152118Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000672 AC XY: 5AN XY: 74370
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
7
AN:
152118
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
5
AN XY:
74370
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Autosomal dominant centronuclear myopathy Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease dominant intermediate B Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at