chr19-1218495-G-A

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000455.5(STK11):c.369G>A(p.Gln123Gln) variant causes a synonymous change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00114 in 1,613,484 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 25 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0058 ( 8 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00066 ( 17 hom. )

Consequence

STK11
NM_000455.5 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:19

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.59

Publications

5 publications found

Variant links:

COSMIC-nc: COSV104641676

Genes affected

STK11 (HGNC:11389): (serine/threonine kinase 11) The protein encoded by this gene is a serine/threonine kinase that regulates cell polarity and energy metabolism and functions as a tumor suppressor. Mutations in this gene have been associated with the autosomal dominant Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, as well as with skin, pancreatic, and testicular cancers. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]

STK11 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

familial pancreatic carcinoma
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
Peutz-Jeghers syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp, G2P
familial ovarian cancer
Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

STK11 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.49).

BP6

Variant 19-1218495-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-1218495-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 141198.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00579 (882/152380) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0198 (824/41584). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0187. There are 8 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 433 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 882 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
STK11	NM_000455.5 link	c.369G>A	p.Gln123Gln	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 10	ENST00000326873.12	NP_000446.1	Q15831-1A0A0S2Z4D1
STK11	NM_001407255.1 link	c.369G>A	p.Gln123Gln	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 9		NP_001394184.1
STK11	NR_176325.1 link	n.1636G>A		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 3 of 11

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
STK11	ENST00000326873.12 link	c.369G>A	p.Gln123Gln	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 10	1	NM_000455.5	ENSP00000324856.6	Q15831-1
STK11	ENST00000652231.1 link	c.369G>A	p.Gln123Gln	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 9			ENSP00000498804.1	Q15831-2
STK11	ENST00000593219.6 link	n.*194G>A		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 3 of 11	3		ENSP00000466610.1	K7EMR0
STK11	ENST00000585748.3 link	c.-4G>A		5_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 4 of 12	3		ENSP00000477641.2	A0A087WT72
STK11	ENST00000593219.6 link	n.*194G>A		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 3 of 11	3		ENSP00000466610.1	K7EMR0

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00579

AC:

881

AN:

152262

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0198

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00275

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000882

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00478

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00149

AC:

370

AN:

249000

AF XY:

0.00108

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0210

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00107

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000177

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000496

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000656

AC:

958

AN:

1461104

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000524

AC XY:

381

AN XY:

726822

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0229

AC:

765

AN:

33470

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00125

AC:

AN:

44718

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26130

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39698

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000104

AC:

AN:

86252

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53000

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000347

AC:

AN:

5766

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00000810

AC:

AN:

1111714

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00194

AC:

117

AN:

60356

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.454

Heterozygous variant carriers

103

154

206

257

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

112

140

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00579

AC:

882

AN:

152380

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00581

AC XY:

433

AN XY:

74524

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0198

AC:

824

AN:

41584

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00274

AC:

AN:

15314

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5186

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4834

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10630

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000882

AC:

AN:

68040

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00473

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.505

Heterozygous variant carriers

148

198

247

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00297

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00723

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00231

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000109

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:19

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:5

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

The STK11 p.Gln123= variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the Cosmic, MutDB, LOVD 3.0, Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database, and Insight Hereditary Tumors Database. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs140112347) as â€šÃ„Ãºotherâ€šÃ„Ã¹, ClinVar (classified as benign/likely benign; submitters: benign by Ambry Genetics, Invitae and Prevention Genetics; likely benign by Illumina Clinical Services Laboratory) and in control databases in 563 (8 homozygous) of 277056 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.002 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Consortium Feb 27, 2017), identified in the following population at a frequency greater than 1%: African in 515 (8 homozygous) of 24002 chromosomes (freq: 0.02) . The p.Gln123= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. The variant occurs 6 nucleotides from the end of exon 2 and and 1 of 5 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing; this is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 04, 2022

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:not provided

- -

Mar 03, 2015

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Peutz-Jeghers syndrome

Benign:5

Mar 25, 2025

Myriad Genetics, Inc.

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. -

Feb 04, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 08, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Jul 15, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 01, 2025

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:4

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 04, 2025

Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:4

Aug 05, 2014

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Sep 15, 2021

Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 10, 2017

True Health Diagnostics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 24, 2015

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Breast and/or ovarian cancer

Benign:1

Dec 07, 2021

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.49

CADD

Benign

7.4

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.95

PhyloP100

3.6

Mutation Taster

=98/2

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over