rs140112347
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_000455.5(STK11):c.369G>A(p.Gln123=) variant causes a synonymous change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00114 in 1,613,484 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 25 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0058 ( 8 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00066 ( 17 hom. )
Consequence
STK11
NM_000455.5 synonymous
NM_000455.5 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 3.59
Genes affected
STK11 (HGNC:11389): (serine/threonine kinase 11) The protein encoded by this gene is a serine/threonine kinase that regulates cell polarity and energy metabolism and functions as a tumor suppressor. Mutations in this gene have been associated with the autosomal dominant Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, as well as with skin, pancreatic, and testicular cancers. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.49).
BP6
Variant 19-1218495-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-1218495-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 141198.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr19-1218495-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr19-1218495-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00579 (882/152380) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0198 (824/41584). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0187. There are 8 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 433 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 882 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STK11 | NM_000455.5 | c.369G>A | p.Gln123= | synonymous_variant | 2/10 | ENST00000326873.12 | |
STK11 | NM_001407255.1 | c.369G>A | p.Gln123= | synonymous_variant | 2/9 | ||
STK11 | NR_176325.1 | n.1636G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 3/11 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STK11 | ENST00000326873.12 | c.369G>A | p.Gln123= | synonymous_variant | 2/10 | 1 | NM_000455.5 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00579 AC: 881AN: 152262Hom.: 8 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
881
AN:
152262
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00149 AC: 370AN: 249000Hom.: 6 AF XY: 0.00108 AC XY: 146AN XY: 135196
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
370
AN:
249000
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
146
AN XY:
135196
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000656 AC: 958AN: 1461104Hom.: 17 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000524 AC XY: 381AN XY: 726822
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
958
AN:
1461104
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
381
AN XY:
726822
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00579 AC: 882AN: 152380Hom.: 8 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00581 AC XY: 433AN XY: 74524
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
882
AN:
152380
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
433
AN XY:
74524
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
8
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:16
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The STK11 p.Gln123= variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the Cosmic, MutDB, LOVD 3.0, Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database, and Insight Hereditary Tumors Database. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs140112347) as “other”, ClinVar (classified as benign/likely benign; submitters: benign by Ambry Genetics, Invitae and Prevention Genetics; likely benign by Illumina Clinical Services Laboratory) and in control databases in 563 (8 homozygous) of 277056 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.002 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Consortium Feb 27, 2017), identified in the following population at a frequency greater than 1%: African in 515 (8 homozygous) of 24002 chromosomes (freq: 0.02) . The p.Gln123= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. The variant occurs 6 nucleotides from the end of exon 2 and and 1 of 5 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing; this is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Jan 04, 2022 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | True Health Diagnostics | Oct 10, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Apr 24, 2015 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C. | Sep 15, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Aug 05, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Peutz-Jeghers syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Feb 08, 2018 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 15, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Dec 07, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at