chr19-38529064-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_000540.3(RYR1):c.11141+7A>G variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00125 in 1,612,862 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 38 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000540.3 splice_region, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYR1 | NM_000540.3 | c.11141+7A>G | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | ENST00000359596.8 | NP_000531.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYR1 | ENST00000359596.8 | c.11141+7A>G | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | 5 | NM_000540.3 | ENSP00000352608.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00176 AC: 267AN: 151810Hom.: 7 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00385 AC: 955AN: 248368Hom.: 20 AF XY: 0.00372 AC XY: 500AN XY: 134500
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00120 AC: 1753AN: 1460934Hom.: 30 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00125 AC XY: 911AN XY: 726752
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00178 AC: 270AN: 151928Hom.: 8 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00194 AC XY: 144AN XY: 74234
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Feb 08, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Sep 25, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Jul 17, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 21, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Nov 10, 2014 | - - |
Congenital multicore myopathy with external ophthalmoplegia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Malignant hyperthermia, susceptibility to, 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
RYR1-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Neuromuscular disease, congenital, with uniform type 1 fiber Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
Central core myopathy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Congenital myopathy with fiber type disproportion;C1840365:King Denborough syndrome;C1850674:Congenital multicore myopathy with external ophthalmoplegia;C2930980:Malignant hyperthermia, susceptibility to, 1;C5830701:Central core myopathy Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Nov 04, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at