chr19-38580114-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. Variant got 9 ACMG points: 9P and 0B. PP1_ModeratePS3_ModeratePS4_ModeratePM1_SupportingPP3_Moderate
This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: This pathogenicity assessment is relevant only for malignant hyperthermia susceptibility (MHS) inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern. Variants in RYR1 can also cause other myopathies inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern or in an autosomal recessive pattern. Some of these disorders may predispose individuals to malignant hyperthermia. RYR1 variants may also contribute to a malignant hyperthermia reaction in combination with other genetic and non-genetic factors and the clinician needs to consider such factors in making management decisions.This sequence variant predicts a substitution of histidine with tyrosine at codon 4822 of the RYR1 protein, p.(His4833Tyr). This variant was not present in a large population database (gnomAD) at the time this variant was interpreted. This variant has been reported in two unrelated individuals who have a personal or family history of a malignant hyperthermia reaction, both of these individuals had a positive in vitro contracture test (IVCT) or caffeine halothane contracture test (CHCT) result (if the proband was unavailable for testing, a positive diagnostic test result in a mutation-positive relative was counted), PS4_Moderate (PMID:18212565). This variant segregates with MHS in five individuals, PP1_Moderate (PMID:18212565). A functional study in HEK293 cells shows an increased sensitivity to RYR1 agonists, PS3_Moderate (PMID:20461000). This variant resides in a region of RYR1 considered to be a hotspot for pathogenic variants that contribute to MHS, PM1_Sup (PMID:21118704). A REVEL score >0.85 (0.975) supports a pathogenic status for this variant, PP3_Moderate. This variant has been classified as Likely Pathogenic. Criteria implemented: PS3_Moderate, PS4_Moderate, PM1_Supporting, PP1_Moderate, PP3_Moderate. LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA024158/MONDO:0007783/012
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000540.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_pathogenic. Variant got 9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYR1 | NM_000540.3 | c.14497C>T | p.His4833Tyr | missense_variant | 100/106 | ENST00000359596.8 | NP_000531.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYR1 | ENST00000359596.8 | c.14497C>T | p.His4833Tyr | missense_variant | 100/106 | 5 | NM_000540.3 | ENSP00000352608 | A2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 31
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Malignant hyperthermia, susceptibility to, 1 Pathogenic:2
Likely pathogenic, reviewed by expert panel | curation | ClinGen Malignant Hyperthermia Susceptibility Variant Curation Expert Panel, ClinGen | Apr 06, 2023 | This pathogenicity assessment is relevant only for malignant hyperthermia susceptibility (MHS) inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern. Variants in RYR1 can also cause other myopathies inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern or in an autosomal recessive pattern. Some of these disorders may predispose individuals to malignant hyperthermia. RYR1 variants may also contribute to a malignant hyperthermia reaction in combination with other genetic and non-genetic factors and the clinician needs to consider such factors in making management decisions. This sequence variant predicts a substitution of histidine with tyrosine at codon 4822 of the RYR1 protein, p.(His4833Tyr). This variant was not present in a large population database (gnomAD) at the time this variant was interpreted. This variant has been reported in two unrelated individuals who have a personal or family history of a malignant hyperthermia reaction, both of these individuals had a positive in vitro contracture test (IVCT) or caffeine halothane contracture test (CHCT) result (if the proband was unavailable for testing, a positive diagnostic test result in a mutation-positive relative was counted), PS4_Moderate (PMID: 18212565). This variant segregates with MHS in five individuals, PP1_Moderate (PMID: 18212565). A functional study in HEK293 cells shows an increased sensitivity to RYR1 agonists, PS3_Moderate (PMID: 20461000). This variant resides in a region of RYR1 considered to be a hotspot for pathogenic variants that contribute to MHS, PM1_Sup (PMID: 21118704). A REVEL score >0.85 (0.975) supports a pathogenic status for this variant, PP3_Moderate. This variant has been classified as Likely Pathogenic. Criteria implemented: PS3_Moderate, PS4_Moderate, PM1_Supporting, PP1_Moderate, PP3_Moderate. - |
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Molecular Genetics, Royal Melbourne Hospital | Mar 30, 2023 | This sequence change is predicted to replace histidine with tyrosine at codon 4833 in exon 100 of the RYR1 protein, p.(His4833Tyr). The histidine residue is evolutionarily conserved (100 vertebrates, UCSC), and is located in the RYR1 channel and activation core. There is a moderate physicochemical difference between histidine and tyrosine. The variant is absent in a large population cohort (gnomAD v2.1 and v3.1). The variant is a European malignant hyperthermia group (EMHG) diagnostic variant. The variant has been identified in individuals with a clinical reaction consistent with malignant hyperthermia (MH) under anaesthesia and confirmed by positive in vitro contracture tests (PMID: 18212565), and segregates with MH susceptibility in at least two large families (PMID: 18212565). Well-established in vitro functional studies of the variant are supportive of a gain of function effect on intracellular calcium release (PMID: 18212565, 20461000). Multiple lines of computational evidence predict a deleterious effect for the missense substitution (5/5 algorithms). Based on the classification scheme RMH Modified ACMG Guidelines v1.3.1, this variant is classified as PATHOGENIC. Following criteria are met: PS3, PP1_Strong, PM2_Supporting, PP3, PP4. - |
methoxyflurane response - Toxicity Other:1
drug response, reviewed by expert panel | curation | PharmGKB | Mar 24, 2021 | PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. Drug-variant association: Toxicity |
sevoflurane response - Toxicity Other:1
drug response, reviewed by expert panel | curation | PharmGKB | Mar 24, 2021 | PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. Drug-variant association: Toxicity |
isoflurane response - Toxicity Other:1
drug response, reviewed by expert panel | curation | PharmGKB | Mar 24, 2021 | PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. Drug-variant association: Toxicity |
enflurane response - Toxicity Other:1
drug response, reviewed by expert panel | curation | PharmGKB | Mar 24, 2021 | PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. Drug-variant association: Toxicity |
halothane response - Toxicity Other:1
drug response, reviewed by expert panel | curation | PharmGKB | Mar 24, 2021 | PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. Drug-variant association: Toxicity |
desflurane response - Toxicity Other:1
drug response, reviewed by expert panel | curation | PharmGKB | Mar 24, 2021 | PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. Drug-variant association: Toxicity |
not provided Other:1
not provided, no classification provided | literature only | Leiden Muscular Dystrophy (RYR1) | - | - - |
succinylcholine response - Toxicity Other:1
drug response, reviewed by expert panel | curation | PharmGKB | Mar 24, 2021 | PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. Drug-variant association: Toxicity |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at