chr19-40394308-C-G

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_181882.3(PRX):c.4044G>C(p.Gly1348Gly) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00111 in 1,610,896 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 15 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0057 ( 9 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00063 ( 6 hom. )

Consequence

PRX
NM_181882.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0380

Publications

1 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

PRX (HGNC:13797): (periaxin) This gene encodes a protein involved in peripheral nerve myelin upkeep. The encoded protein contains 2 PDZ domains which were named after PSD95 (post synaptic density protein), DlgA (Drosophila disc large tumor suppressor), and ZO1 (a mammalian tight junction protein). Two alternatively spliced transcript variants have been described for this gene which encode different protein isoforms and which are targeted differently in the Schwann cell. Mutations in this gene cause Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuoropathy, type 4F and Dejerine-Sottas neuropathy. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

PRX Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4F
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, Ambry Genetics
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 3
Inheritance: AD, AR Classification: MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Ambry Genetics

PRX links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.71).

BP6

Variant 19-40394308-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-40394308-C-G is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 329250.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.038 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00574 (874/152276) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0201 (835/41562). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.019. There are 9 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 412 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 9 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein
PRX	NM_181882.3 link	c.4044G>C	p.Gly1348Gly	synonymous_variant	Exon 7 of 7	ENST00000324001.8	NP_870998.2
PRX	NM_001411127.1 link	c.4329G>C	p.Gly1443Gly	synonymous_variant	Exon 7 of 7		NP_001398056.1
PRX	XM_017027047.2 link	c.3942G>C	p.Gly1314Gly	synonymous_variant	Exon 4 of 4		XP_016882536.1
PRX	NM_020956.2 link	c.*4249G>C		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 6 of 6		NP_066007.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
PRX	ENST00000324001.8 link	c.4044G>C	p.Gly1348Gly	synonymous_variant	Exon 7 of 7	1	NM_181882.3	ENSP00000326018.6

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00574

AC:

874

AN:

152160

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0201

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00144

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000221

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000956

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00145

AC:

346

AN:

239188

AF XY:

0.00104

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0200

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000863

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000561

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000103

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00119

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000632

AC:

922

AN:

1458620

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000543

AC XY:

394

AN XY:

725444

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0193

AC:

644

AN:

33388

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00118

AC:

AN:

44156

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

25998

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0000253

AC:

AN:

39564

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000466

AC:

AN:

85908

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53082

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00104

AC:

AN:

5766

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000105

AC:

117

AN:

1110506

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00163

AC:

AN:

60252

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.486

Heterozygous variant carriers

136

204

272

340

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

120

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00574

AC:

874

AN:

152276

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00553

AC XY:

412

AN XY:

74450

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0201

AC:

835

AN:

41562

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00144

AC:

AN:

15306

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5170

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4832

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10624

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000221

AC:

AN:

67992

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000947

AC:

AN:

2112

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.495

Heterozygous variant carriers

138

184

230

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000828

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00650

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00173

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:8

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:2

Mar 18, 2022

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:not provided

- -

not specified

Benign:1

Dec 06, 2016

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease

Benign:1

Molecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dejerine-Sottas disease;C3540453:Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4F

Benign:1

Aug 16, 2021

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Jul 11, 2019

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4F

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.71

CADD

Benign

0.96

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.56

PhyloP100

-0.038

Mutation Taster

=97/3

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over