chr2-161231523-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_001199135.3(TANK):c.1073C>T(p.Pro358Leu) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00337 in 1,612,588 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 143 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Likely benignin UniProt.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001199135.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TANK | NM_001199135.3 | c.1073C>T | p.Pro358Leu | missense_variant | 7/8 | ENST00000392749.7 | NP_001186064.1 | |
PSMD14-DT | NR_110593.1 | n.349-8040G>A | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TANK | ENST00000392749.7 | c.1073C>T | p.Pro358Leu | missense_variant | 7/8 | 1 | NM_001199135.3 | ENSP00000376505 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0163 AC: 2475AN: 152064Hom.: 61 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00462 AC: 1148AN: 248646Hom.: 24 AF XY: 0.00340 AC XY: 458AN XY: 134788
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00202 AC: 2953AN: 1460406Hom.: 81 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00181 AC XY: 1313AN XY: 726608
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0163 AC: 2479AN: 152182Hom.: 62 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0159 AC XY: 1180AN XY: 74406
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | May 21, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at