chr2-169294161-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -18 ACMG points: 0P and 18B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_004525.3(LRP2):​c.639C>T​(p.Asp213Asp) variant causes a synonymous change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.28 in 1,602,868 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 66,760 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.31 ( 7473 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.28 ( 59287 hom. )

Consequence

LRP2
NM_004525.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.09

Publications

25 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
LRP2 (HGNC:6694): (LDL receptor related protein 2) The protein encoded by this gene, low density lipoprotein-related protein 2 (LRP2) or megalin, is a multi-ligand endocytic receptor that is expressed in many different tissues but primarily in absorptive epithilial tissues such as the kidney. This glycoprotein has a large amino-terminal extracellular domain, a single transmembrane domain, and a short carboxy-terminal cytoplasmic tail. The extracellular ligand-binding-domains bind diverse macromolecules including albumin, apolipoproteins B and E, and lipoprotein lipase. The LRP2 protein is critical for the reuptake of numerous ligands, including lipoproteins, sterols, vitamin-binding proteins, and hormones. This protein also has a role in cell-signaling; extracellular ligands include parathyroid horomones and the morphogen sonic hedgehog while cytosolic ligands include MAP kinase scaffold proteins and JNK interacting proteins. Recycling of this membrane receptor is regulated by phosphorylation of its cytoplasmic domain. Mutations in this gene cause Donnai-Barrow syndrome (DBS) and facio-oculoacoustico-renal syndrome (FOAR).[provided by RefSeq, Aug 2009]
LRP2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Donnai-Barrow syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Orphanet
  • Stickler syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • intellectual disability
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: G2P

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -18 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.43).
BP6
Variant 2-169294161-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-169294161-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 129533.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.442 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
LRP2NM_004525.3 linkc.639C>T p.Asp213Asp synonymous_variant Exon 6 of 79 ENST00000649046.1 NP_004516.2 P98164Q7Z5C0Q7Z5C1
LRP2XM_047444340.1 linkc.-286C>T 5_prime_UTR_premature_start_codon_gain_variant Exon 6 of 79 XP_047300296.1
LRP2XM_011511183.4 linkc.639C>T p.Asp213Asp synonymous_variant Exon 6 of 78 XP_011509485.1
LRP2XM_047444340.1 linkc.-286C>T 5_prime_UTR_variant Exon 6 of 79 XP_047300296.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
LRP2ENST00000649046.1 linkc.639C>T p.Asp213Asp synonymous_variant Exon 6 of 79 NM_004525.3 ENSP00000496870.1 P98164
LRP2ENST00000443831.1 linkc.639C>T p.Asp213Asp synonymous_variant Exon 6 of 23 2 ENSP00000409813.1 E9PC35

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.306
AC:
46427
AN:
151702
Hom.:
7465
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.334
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.398
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.446
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.275
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.458
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.346
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.222
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.218
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.257
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.296
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.327
AC:
82118
AN:
251316
AF XY:
0.315
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.330
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.546
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.258
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.481
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.217
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.264
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.302
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.277
AC:
402433
AN:
1451048
Hom.:
59287
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.278
AC XY:
200550
AN XY:
722626
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.333
AC:
11037
AN:
33186
American (AMR)
AF:
0.537
AC:
23998
AN:
44690
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.267
AC:
6970
AN:
26062
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.433
AC:
17143
AN:
39616
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.328
AC:
28191
AN:
85990
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.222
AC:
11842
AN:
53416
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.225
AC:
1297
AN:
5752
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.258
AC:
284843
AN:
1102268
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.285
AC:
17112
AN:
60068
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.452
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
13864
27728
41592
55456
69320
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
9860
19720
29580
39440
49300
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.306
AC:
46474
AN:
151820
Hom.:
7473
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.307
AC XY:
22771
AN XY:
74170
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.334
AC:
13821
AN:
41388
American (AMR)
AF:
0.446
AC:
6810
AN:
15258
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.275
AC:
952
AN:
3466
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.458
AC:
2361
AN:
5160
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.345
AC:
1657
AN:
4798
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.222
AC:
2336
AN:
10508
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.218
AC:
64
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.257
AC:
17485
AN:
67930
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.297
AC:
626
AN:
2108
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.503
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1590
3179
4769
6358
7948
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
464
928
1392
1856
2320
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.283
Hom.:
13609
Bravo
AF:
0.325
Asia WGS
AF:
0.410
AC:
1425
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.253
EpiControl
AF:
0.260

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:2
-
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Donnai-Barrow syndrome Benign:2
Jul 15, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.43
CADD
Benign
11
DANN
Benign
0.63
PhyloP100
5.1
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2229266; hg19: chr2-170150671; COSMIC: COSV55541964; API