chr2-201079018-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points: 3P and 1B. PM2PP2BP4
The NM_002491.3(NDUFB3):c.136G>A(p.Gly46Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000055 in 1,454,990 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002491.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- mitochondrial complex I deficiency, nuclear type 25Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: G2P, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- mitochondrial diseaseInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- mitochondrial complex I deficiencyInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_002491.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NDUFB3 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.136G>A | p.Gly46Ser | missense | Exon 2 of 3 | ENSP00000237889.4 | O43676 | ||
| NDUFB3 | TSL:2 | c.136G>A | p.Gly46Ser | missense | Exon 3 of 4 | ENSP00000410600.1 | O43676 | ||
| NDUFB3 | TSL:3 | c.136G>A | p.Gly46Ser | missense | Exon 2 of 3 | ENSP00000401834.2 | O43676 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000550 AC: 8AN: 1454990Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 723858 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at