chr2-210591913-A-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The ENST00000233072.10(CPS1):c.1030A>T(p.Thr344Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00273 in 1,611,196 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 105 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Benignin ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. T344A) has been classified as Benign.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000233072.10 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPS1 | NM_001875.5 | c.1030A>T | p.Thr344Ser | missense_variant | 10/38 | ENST00000233072.10 | NP_001866.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPS1 | ENST00000233072.10 | c.1030A>T | p.Thr344Ser | missense_variant | 10/38 | 1 | NM_001875.5 | ENSP00000233072 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0139 AC: 2108AN: 151268Hom.: 46 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00372 AC: 929AN: 249584Hom.: 23 AF XY: 0.00293 AC XY: 395AN XY: 134908
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00156 AC: 2281AN: 1459812Hom.: 59 Cov.: 43 AF XY: 0.00133 AC XY: 966AN XY: 726220
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0139 AC: 2111AN: 151384Hom.: 46 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0139 AC XY: 1026AN XY: 73926
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Congenital hyperammonemia, type I Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jun 10, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Feb 12, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at