chr2-214729010-T-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. Variant got 7 ACMG points: 7P and 0B. PVS1_StrongPM2PP5
The NM_000465.4(BARD1):c.2002-2A>C variant causes a splice acceptor, intron change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predicting alterations to normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000465.4 splice_acceptor, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_pathogenic. Variant got 7 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Familial cancer of breast Pathogenic:1Uncertain:1
This sequence change affects an acceptor splice site in intron 10 of the BARD1 gene. While this variant is not anticipated to result in nonsense mediated decay, it likely alters RNA splicing and results in a disrupted protein product. This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). Disruption of this splice site has been observed in individual(s) with breast cancer and prostate cancer (PMID: 25452441, 31036035, 32338768, 33804961). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 265365). Variants that disrupt the consensus splice site are a relatively common cause of aberrant splicing (PMID: 17576681, 9536098). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of sequence changes on RNA splicing suggest that this variant may disrupt the consensus splice site. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
This variant is considered likely pathogenic. This variant occurs within a consensus splice junction and is predicted to result in abnormal mRNA splicing of either an out-of-frame exon or an in-frame exon necessary for protein stability and/or normal function. -
not provided Pathogenic:1
This variant is denoted BARD1 c.2002-2A>C or IVS10-2A>C and consists of an A>C nucleotide substitution at the -2 position of intron 10 of the BARD1 gene. This variant destroys a canonical splice acceptor site and is predicted to cause abnormal gene splicing, leading to either an abnormal message that is subject to nonsense-mediated mRNA decay or to an abnormal protein product. This variant was observed in an individual with triple negative breast cancer (Couch 2015). Based on the currently available evidence, we consider BARD1 c.2002-2A>C to be a likely pathogenic variant. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1
The c.2002-2A>C intronic variant results from an A to C substitution two nucleotides upstream from coding exon 11 in the BARD1 gene. This alteration has been detected in 1/1824 patients with triple negative breast cancer who were unselected for a family history of breast or ovarian cancer (Couch FJ et al. J. Clin. Oncol., 2015 Feb;33:304-11). In addition, this alteration was identified in two individuals with personal and family history of breast cancer in a cohort of 4469 breast cancer index patients (Weber-Lassalle N et al. Breast Cancer Res., 2019 04;21:55). This nucleotide position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In silico splice site analysis predicts that this alteration will weaken the native splice acceptor site and will result in the creation or strengthening of a novel splice acceptor site. RNA studies have demonstrated that this alteration results in a transcript predicted to lead to a protein with an in-frame deletion of three amino acids; however, the exact functional impact of the deleted amino acids is unknown at this time (Ambry internal data). Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at