chr2-214769302-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4BS2
The NM_000465.4(BARD1):c.1325C>T(p.Pro442Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000026 in 1,460,666 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000465.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BARD1 | NM_000465.4 | c.1325C>T | p.Pro442Leu | missense_variant | 5/11 | ENST00000260947.9 | NP_000456.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BARD1 | ENST00000260947.9 | c.1325C>T | p.Pro442Leu | missense_variant | 5/11 | 1 | NM_000465.4 | ENSP00000260947 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000119 AC: 3AN: 251198Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000147 AC XY: 2AN XY: 135762
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000260 AC: 38AN: 1460666Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0000248 AC XY: 18AN XY: 726726
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:4
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 06, 2024 | This sequence change replaces proline, which is neutral and non-polar, with leucine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 442 of the BARD1 protein (p.Pro442Leu). This variant is present in population databases (rs730881417, gnomAD 0.003%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with BARD1-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 182045). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant is likely to be tolerated. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Feb 24, 2023 | This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | May 02, 2018 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Baylor Genetics | Sep 05, 2023 | - - |
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 08, 2023 | Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 18480049) - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Dec 05, 2016 | Variant summary: The c.1325C>T variant involves the alteration of a conserved nucleotide and 2/3 in silico tools predict a pathogenic outcome. The variant was observed in the large and broad cohorts of the ExAC project at an allele frequency of 0.0008% which does not exceed the maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in BARD1 (0.02%). The variant of interest has not, to our knowledge, been reported in affected individuals via publications nor evaluated for functional impact by in vivo/vitro studies, however one reputable clinical lab has classified the variant as a VUS. Because of the absence of clinical information and the lack of functional studies, the variant was classified as a variant of uncertain significance (VUS) until additional information becomes available. - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Mar 07, 2023 | This missense variant replaces proline with leucine at codon 442 of the BARD1 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has not been reported in individuals affected with BARD1-related disorders in the literature. This variant has been identified in 3/251198 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Sep 10, 2023 | The p.P442L variant (also known as c.1325C>T), located in coding exon 5 of the BARD1 gene, results from a C to T substitution at nucleotide position 1325. The proline at codon 442 is replaced by leucine, an amino acid with similar properties. This amino acid position is not well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at