chr2-218262959-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 1 ACMG points: 2P and 1B. PM2BP4
The NM_170699.3(GPBAR1):c.235C>T(p.Arg79Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000347 in 1,613,938 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_170699.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 1 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPBAR1 | NM_170699.3 | c.235C>T | p.Arg79Cys | missense_variant | 2/2 | ENST00000519574.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPBAR1 | ENST00000519574.2 | c.235C>T | p.Arg79Cys | missense_variant | 2/2 | 1 | NM_170699.3 | P1 | |
GPBAR1 | ENST00000479077.5 | c.235C>T | p.Arg79Cys | missense_variant | 2/2 | 2 | P1 | ||
GPBAR1 | ENST00000521462.1 | c.235C>T | p.Arg79Cys | missense_variant | 2/2 | 2 | P1 | ||
GPBAR1 | ENST00000522678.5 | c.235C>T | p.Arg79Cys | missense_variant | 2/2 | 2 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152152Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000321 AC: 8AN: 248904Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000518 AC XY: 7AN XY: 135048
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000356 AC: 52AN: 1461668Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000275 AC XY: 20AN XY: 727116
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152270Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000403 AC XY: 3AN XY: 74442
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Nov 08, 2017 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at