chr2-219551528-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 4 ACMG points: 4P and 0B. PVS1_ModeratePM2
The NM_015311.3(OBSL1):c.5683+1G>C variant causes a splice donor, intron change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000349 in 1,431,648 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predicting alterations to normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_015311.3 splice_donor, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 4 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000148 AC: 3AN: 202956Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000273 AC XY: 3AN XY: 109798
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000349 AC: 5AN: 1431648Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00000564 AC XY: 4AN XY: 709126
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1
Variant summary: OBSL1 c.5683+1G>C is located in a canonical splice-site and is predicted to affect mRNA splicing resulting in a significantly altered protein due to either exon skipping, shortening, or inclusion of intronic material. Several computational tools predict a significant impact on normal splicing: Four predict the variant abolishes a 5' splicing donor site. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 1.5e-05 in 202956 control chromosomes. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.5683+1G>C in individuals affected with Three M Syndrome 2 and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014. Furthermore, no loss of function variants have been reported downstream of this region in the HGMD/LOVD database. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as VUS. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at