chr2-26479640-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_194248.3(OTOF):​c.1926C>T​(p.Asn642Asn) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0221 in 1,612,446 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 489 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.026 ( 58 hom., cov: 34)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.022 ( 431 hom. )

Consequence

OTOF
NM_194248.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.0160

Publications

4 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
OTOF (HGNC:8515): (otoferlin) Mutations in this gene are a cause of neurosensory nonsyndromic recessive deafness, DFNB9. The short form of the encoded protein has 3 C2 domains, a single carboxy-terminal transmembrane domain found also in the C. elegans spermatogenesis factor FER-1 and human dysferlin, while the long form has 6 C2 domains. The homology suggests that this protein may be involved in vesicle membrane fusion. Several transcript variants encoding multiple isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
OTOF Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 9
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
  • hearing loss, autosomal recessive
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.48).
BP6
Variant 2-26479640-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-26479640-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 21828.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.016 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0258 (3931/152352) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0445 (1850/41586). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0428. There are 58 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 1828 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 34. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 58 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
OTOFNM_194248.3 linkc.1926C>T p.Asn642Asn synonymous_variant Exon 17 of 47 ENST00000272371.7 NP_919224.1
OTOFNM_001287489.2 linkc.1926C>T p.Asn642Asn synonymous_variant Exon 17 of 46 NP_001274418.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
OTOFENST00000272371.7 linkc.1926C>T p.Asn642Asn synonymous_variant Exon 17 of 47 1 NM_194248.3 ENSP00000272371.2
OTOFENST00000403946.7 linkc.1926C>T p.Asn642Asn synonymous_variant Exon 17 of 46 5 ENSP00000385255.3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0258
AC:
3929
AN:
152234
Hom.:
58
Cov.:
34
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0445
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0132
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0194
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0236
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0200
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0348
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0208
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0215
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0186
AC:
4637
AN:
249340
AF XY:
0.0181
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0460
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0131
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0221
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0221
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0225
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0205
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0217
AC:
31691
AN:
1460094
Hom.:
431
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.0210
AC XY:
15270
AN XY:
726228
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0471
AC:
1577
AN:
33470
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0138
AC:
616
AN:
44706
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0210
AC:
550
AN:
26130
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000252
AC:
1
AN:
39680
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00356
AC:
307
AN:
86246
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0229
AC:
1194
AN:
52128
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0222
AC:
128
AN:
5764
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0234
AC:
26017
AN:
1111622
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0216
AC:
1301
AN:
60348
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.466
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1599
3198
4796
6395
7994
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0258
AC:
3931
AN:
152352
Hom.:
58
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.0245
AC XY:
1828
AN XY:
74490
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0445
AC:
1850
AN:
41586
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0193
AC:
296
AN:
15312
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0236
AC:
82
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5180
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00207
AC:
10
AN:
4834
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0200
AC:
212
AN:
10618
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0374
AC:
11
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0208
AC:
1413
AN:
68028
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0213
AC:
45
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.499
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
199
398
598
797
996
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
44
88
132
176
220
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0235
Hom.:
29
Bravo
AF:
0.0273
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00635
AC:
23
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0244
EpiControl
AF:
0.0244

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:4
Aug 31, 2018
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

Jan 30, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Nov 11, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

not specified Benign:3
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Oct 06, 2010
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Asn642Asn in exon 17 of OTOF: This variant is not expected to have clinical sign ificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located near a splice junction, is listed in dbSNP (rs72853741 ? no frequency data), has been f ound in 5/150 (3%) cases in our laboratory (two of whom have other hearing loss etiologies), and is reported as benign in two publications (Smith 2008, Varga 20 06).

Jan 02, 2018
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 9 Benign:1Other:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease.

GeneReviews
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:literature only

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.48
CADD
Benign
1.3
DANN
Benign
0.48
PhyloP100
0.016
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.090
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs72853741; hg19: chr2-26702508; COSMIC: COSV55516132; COSMIC: COSV55516132; API