chr2-39067726-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -7 ACMG points: 0P and 7B. BP4_ModerateBP6BS2
The NM_005633.4(SOS1):c.115G>A(p.Glu39Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000105 in 1,612,440 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. E39V) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_005633.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Noonan syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
- Noonan syndrome 4Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, G2P, PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- fibromatosis, gingival, 1Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- hereditary gingival fibromatosisInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- cardiofaciocutaneous syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
- Costello syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -7 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_005633.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOS1 | NM_005633.4 | MANE Select | c.115G>A | p.Glu39Lys | missense | Exon 2 of 23 | NP_005624.2 | ||
| SOS1 | NM_001382394.1 | c.94G>A | p.Glu32Lys | missense | Exon 2 of 23 | NP_001369323.1 | |||
| SOS1 | NM_001382395.1 | c.115G>A | p.Glu39Lys | missense | Exon 2 of 22 | NP_001369324.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOS1 | ENST00000402219.8 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.115G>A | p.Glu39Lys | missense | Exon 2 of 23 | ENSP00000384675.2 | ||
| SOS1 | ENST00000395038.6 | TSL:5 | c.115G>A | p.Glu39Lys | missense | Exon 2 of 22 | ENSP00000378479.2 | ||
| SOS1 | ENST00000692089.1 | c.115G>A | p.Glu39Lys | missense | Exon 2 of 22 | ENSP00000508626.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000329 AC: 5AN: 152112Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000119 AC: 3AN: 251398 AF XY: 0.00 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000822 AC: 12AN: 1460328Hom.: 0 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.00000413 AC XY: 3AN XY: 726586 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000329 AC: 5AN: 152112Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74296 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.
Noonan syndrome 4 Benign:1
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.
RASopathy Benign:1
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at