chr2-43823981-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. Variant got 9 ACMG points: 9P and 0B. PM1PM2PM5PP3_ModeratePP5
The NM_022436.3(ABCG5):c.1256G>A(p.Arg419His) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000254 in 1,614,064 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R419P) has been classified as Pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_022436.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_pathogenic. Variant got 9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABCG5 | NM_022436.3 | c.1256G>A | p.Arg419His | missense_variant | 9/13 | ENST00000405322.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABCG5 | ENST00000405322.8 | c.1256G>A | p.Arg419His | missense_variant | 9/13 | 1 | NM_022436.3 | P1 | |
ABCG5 | ENST00000486512.5 | n.1777G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 5/9 | 1 | ||||
ABCG5 | ENST00000409962.1 | n.1539G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 5/9 | 2 | ||||
ABCG5 | ENST00000644754.1 | n.1640G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 6/10 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152170Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000239 AC: 6AN: 251472Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 135912
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000274 AC: 40AN: 1461894Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000234 AC XY: 17AN XY: 727248
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152170Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74338
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Sitosterolemia 2 Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | OMIM | Jan 01, 2001 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at