chr2-73452534-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The ENST00000613296.6(ALMS1):āc.6007A>Gā(p.Ile2003Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000765 in 1,614,038 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 11/16 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ā ). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. I2003M) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000613296.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALMS1 | NM_001378454.1 | c.6007A>G | p.Ile2003Val | missense_variant | 8/23 | ENST00000613296.6 | NP_001365383.1 | |
ALMS1 | NM_015120.4 | c.6010A>G | p.Ile2004Val | missense_variant | 8/23 | NP_055935.4 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALMS1 | ENST00000613296.6 | c.6007A>G | p.Ile2003Val | missense_variant | 8/23 | 1 | NM_001378454.1 | ENSP00000482968 | P3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00369 AC: 561AN: 152174Hom.: 3 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00105 AC: 261AN: 249114Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000851 AC XY: 115AN XY: 135142
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000460 AC: 672AN: 1461746Hom.: 2 Cov.: 38 AF XY: 0.000417 AC XY: 303AN XY: 727178
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00370 AC: 563AN: 152292Hom.: 3 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00336 AC XY: 250AN XY: 74460
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Mar 21, 2016 | p.Ile2002Val in exon 8 of ALMS1: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it has been identified in 1.27% (124/9766) of African chromo somes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs7587103). - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Aug 23, 2023 | Variant summary: ALMS1 c.6004A>G (p.Ile2002Val) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.002 in 393874 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.013 within the African or African-American subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency within African or African-American control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 6 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in ALMS1 causing Cardiomyopathy phenotype (0.0022), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of African or African-American origin. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.6004A>G in individuals affected with Cardiomyopathy and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Six submitters have reported clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014. All submitters classified the variant as benign (n = 3) or likely benign (n = 3). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. - |
not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | Dec 22, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Aug 09, 2019 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Alstrom syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Clinical Genomics, Uppaluri K&H Personalized Medicine Clinic | - | Potent mutations in ALMS1 are associated with a rare condition called Alstrom syndrome. It can cause excessive eating, insulin resistance. However, no evidence is found to ascertain the role of rs7587103 in Alstrom syndrome yet. - |
Monogenic diabetes Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Personalized Diabetes Medicine Program, University of Maryland School of Medicine | Mar 27, 2018 | ACMG criteria: BP4(8 predictors, REVEL=0.017),BS1(1.27% in ExAC African population), BP1(missense in gene with truncating cause disease), 1 homozygote in gnomAD=likely benign - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jan 21, 2019 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at