rs7587103

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001378454.1(ALMS1):​c.6007A>G​(p.Ile2003Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000765 in 1,614,038 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/17 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. I2003M) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0037 ( 3 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00046 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

ALMS1
NM_001378454.1 missense

Scores

14

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.19

Publications

5 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
ALMS1 (HGNC:428): (ALMS1 centrosome and basal body associated protein) This gene encodes a protein containing a large tandem-repeat domain as well as additional low complexity regions. The encoded protein functions in microtubule organization, particularly in the formation and maintanance of cilia. Mutations in this gene cause Alstrom syndrome. There is a pseudogene for this gene located adjacent in the same region of chromosome 2. Alternative splice variants have been described but their full length nature has not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2014]
ALMS1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Alstrom syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, PanelApp Australia, G2P, Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.003609687).
BP6
Variant 2-73452534-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-73452534-A-G is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 221017.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0037 (563/152292) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0122 (507/41570). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0113. There are 3 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 250 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 3 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
ALMS1NM_001378454.1 linkc.6007A>G p.Ile2003Val missense_variant Exon 8 of 23 ENST00000613296.6 NP_001365383.1
ALMS1NM_015120.4 linkc.6007A>G p.Ile2003Val missense_variant Exon 8 of 23 NP_055935.4

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ALMS1ENST00000613296.6 linkc.6007A>G p.Ile2003Val missense_variant Exon 8 of 23 1 NM_001378454.1 ENSP00000482968.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00369
AC:
561
AN:
152174
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0122
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00249
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000963
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0000942
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000118
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00144
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00105
AC:
261
AN:
249114
AF XY:
0.000851
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0130
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000753
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000445
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000195
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000661
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000460
AC:
672
AN:
1461746
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
38
AF XY:
0.000417
AC XY:
303
AN XY:
727178
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0137
AC:
457
AN:
33474
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000805
AC:
36
AN:
44714
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26132
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000151
AC:
6
AN:
39698
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
86256
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0000187
AC:
1
AN:
53378
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000693
AC:
4
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000980
AC:
109
AN:
1111932
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000977
AC:
59
AN:
60394
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.491
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
53
105
158
210
263
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00370
AC:
563
AN:
152292
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00336
AC XY:
250
AN XY:
74460
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0122
AC:
507
AN:
41570
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00248
AC:
38
AN:
15298
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000965
AC:
5
AN:
5180
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4824
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0000942
AC:
1
AN:
10618
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00340
AC:
1
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000118
AC:
8
AN:
68016
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00142
AC:
3
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.500
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
29
57
86
114
143
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00140
Hom.:
5
Bravo
AF:
0.00409
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0119
AC:
44
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.00125
AC:
151
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000577
AC:
2
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000164
EpiControl
AF:
0.000237

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:12
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Mar 21, 2016
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

p.Ile2002Val in exon 8 of ALMS1: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it has been identified in 1.27% (124/9766) of African chromo somes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs7587103). -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 23, 2023
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: ALMS1 c.6004A>G (p.Ile2002Val) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.002 in 393874 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.013 within the African or African-American subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency within African or African-American control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 6 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in ALMS1 causing Cardiomyopathy phenotype (0.0022), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of African or African-American origin. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.6004A>G in individuals affected with Cardiomyopathy and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Six submitters have reported clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014. All submitters classified the variant as benign (n = 3) or likely benign (n = 3). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

not provided Benign:4
Dec 22, 2015
Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Aug 09, 2019
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Alstrom syndrome Benign:2
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genomics, Uppaluri K&H Personalized Medicine Clinic
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:research

Potent mutations in ALMS1 are associated with a rare condition called Alstrom syndrome. It can cause excessive eating, insulin resistance. However, no evidence is found to ascertain the role of rs7587103 in Alstrom syndrome yet. -

Monogenic diabetes Benign:1
Mar 27, 2018
Personalized Diabetes Medicine Program, University of Maryland School of Medicine
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:research

ACMG criteria: BP4(8 predictors, REVEL=0.017),BS1(1.27% in ExAC African population), BP1(missense in gene with truncating cause disease), 1 homozygote in gnomAD=likely benign -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Jan 21, 2019
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.082
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.65
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.70
CADD
Benign
0.0030
DANN
Benign
0.40
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.0084
T;.;.
Eigen
Benign
-1.7
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.8
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.0085
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.37
T;T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0036
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.96
T
PhyloP100
-1.2
PrimateAI
Benign
0.22
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.73
T;T;T
Vest4
0.044
MVP
0.085
ClinPred
0.0016
T
GERP RS
-8.3
PromoterAI
0.0012
Neutral
Varity_R
0.014
gMVP
0.011
Mutation Taster
=97/3
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs7587103; hg19: chr2-73679661; API