rs7587103

chr2-73452534-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_Strong BP6_Very_Strong BS1 BS2

The NM_001378454.1(ALMS1):c.6007A>G(p.Ile2003Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000765 in 1,614,038 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 10/15 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. I2003M) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.0037 (3 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.00046 (2 hom.)
• Consequence: ALMS1 NM_001378454.1 missense
• Clinical Significance: Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11
• Conservation: PhyloP100: -1.19

Genes affected

ALMS1 (HGNC:428): (ALMS1 centrosome and basal body associated protein) This gene encodes a protein containing a large tandem-repeat domain as well as additional low complexity regions. The encoded protein functions in microtubule organization, particularly in the formation and maintanance of cilia. Mutations in this gene cause Alstrom syndrome. There is a pseudogene for this gene located adjacent in the same region of chromosome 2. Alternative splice variants have been described but their full length nature has not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2014]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.003609687).
• BP6: Variant 2-73452534-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-73452534-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 221017.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0037 (563/152292) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0122 (507/41570). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0113. There are 3 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 250 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.
• BS2: High Homozygotes in GnomAd at 3 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
ALMS1	NM_001378454.1	c.6007A>G	p.Ile2003Val	missense_variant	8/23	ENST00000613296.6
ALMS1	NM_015120.4	c.6010A>G	p.Ile2004Val	missense_variant	8/23

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
ALMS1	ENST00000613296.6	c.6007A>G	p.Ile2003Val	missense_variant	8/23	1	NM_001378454.1	P3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00369 AC: 561 AN: 152174 Hom.: 3 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.0122

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.00249

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.000963

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.0000942

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00316

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.000118

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00144

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00105 AC: 261 AN: 249114 Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000851 AC XY: 115 AN XY: 135142

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.0130

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.000753

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.000445

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.000195

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.000661

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000460 AC: 672 AN: 1461746 Hom.: 2 Cov.: 38 AF XY: 0.000417 AC XY: 303 AN XY: 727178

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.0137

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.000805

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.000151

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.0000187

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.0000980

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.000977

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00370 AC: 563 AN: 152292 Hom.: 3 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00336 AC XY: 250 AN XY: 74460

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.0122

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.00248

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.000965

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.0000942

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.000118

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00142

Alfa AF: 0.000715 Hom.: 3

Bravo AF: 0.00409

ESP6500AA AF: 0.0119 AC: 44

ESP6500EA AF: 0.00 AC: 0

ExAC AF: 0.00125 AC: 151

Asia WGS AF: 0.000577 AC: 2 AN: 3478

EpiCase AF: 0.000164

EpiControl AF: 0.000237

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:11

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4

Benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center	-	- -
Benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht	-	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine	Mar 21, 2016	p.Ile2002Val in exon 8 of ALMS1: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it has been identified in 1.27% (124/9766) of African chromo somes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs7587103). -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp	Aug 23, 2023	Variant summary: ALMS1 c.6004A>G (p.Ile2002Val) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.002 in 393874 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.013 within the African or African-American subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency within African or African-American control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 6 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in ALMS1 causing Cardiomyopathy phenotype (0.0022), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of African or African-American origin. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.6004A>G in individuals affected with Cardiomyopathy and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Six submitters have reported clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014. All submitters classified the variant as benign (n = 3) or likely benign (n = 3). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

not provided Benign:3

Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)	-	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Aug 09, 2019	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics	Dec 22, 2015	- -

Alstrom syndrome Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	research	Clinical Genomics, Uppaluri K&H Personalized Medicine Clinic	-	Potent mutations in ALMS1 are associated with a rare condition called Alstrom syndrome. It can cause excessive eating, insulin resistance. However, no evidence is found to ascertain the role of rs7587103 in Alstrom syndrome yet. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Invitae	Jan 31, 2024	- -

Monogenic diabetes Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

research

Personalized Diabetes Medicine Program, University of Maryland School of Medicine

Mar 27, 2018

ACMG criteria: BP4(8 predictors, REVEL=0.017),BS1(1.27% in ExAC African population), BP1(missense in gene with truncating cause disease), 1 homozygote in gnomAD=likely benign -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Ambry Genetics

Jan 21, 2019

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
AlphaMissense	Benign	0.082
BayesDel_addAF	Benign	-0.65	T
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.70
Cadd	Benign	0.0030
Dann	Benign	0.40
DEOGEN2	Benign	0.0084	T;.;.
Eigen	Benign	-1.7
Eigen_PC	Benign	-1.8
FATHMM_MKL	Benign	0.0085	N
LIST_S2	Benign	0.37	T;T;T
MetaRNN	Benign	0.0036	T;T;T
MetaSVM	Benign	-0.96	T
MutationTaster	Benign	1.0	N;N;N
PrimateAI	Benign	0.22	T
Sift4G	Benign	0.73	T;T;T
Vest4		0.044
MVP		0.085
ClinPred		0.0016	T
GERP RS		-8.3
Varity_R		0.014
gMVP		0.011

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs7587103; hg19: chr2-73679661;