chr2-84443366-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 1P and 7B. PP3BP4_ModerateBS1_SupportingBS2
The NM_003849.4(SUCLG1):c.236G>A(p.Gly79Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00138 in 1,614,146 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00097 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0014 ( 2 hom. )
Consequence
SUCLG1
NM_003849.4 missense
NM_003849.4 missense
Scores
11
5
3
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 7.89
Genes affected
SUCLG1 (HGNC:11449): (succinate-CoA ligase GDP/ADP-forming subunit alpha) This gene encodes the alpha subunit of the heterodimeric enzyme succinate coenzyme A ligase. This enzyme is targeted to the mitochondria and catalyzes the conversion of succinyl CoA and ADP or GDP to succinate and ATP or GTP. Mutations in this gene are the cause of the metabolic disorder fatal infantile lactic acidosis and mitochondrial DNA depletion. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2010]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.
PP3
Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect 9: BayesDel_addAF, BayesDel_noAF, Cadd, Eigen, M_CAP, MutationAssessor, phyloP100way_vertebrate, PROVEAN, REVEL [when AlphaMissense, max_spliceai, FATHMM_MKL, MetaRNN, MutationTaster was below the threshold]
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.16022444).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000965 (147/152300) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00137 (93/68020). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00114. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 66 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SUCLG1 | NM_003849.4 | c.236G>A | p.Gly79Asp | missense_variant | 3/9 | ENST00000393868.7 | NP_003840.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SUCLG1 | ENST00000393868.7 | c.236G>A | p.Gly79Asp | missense_variant | 3/9 | 1 | NM_003849.4 | ENSP00000377446.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000966 AC: 147AN: 152182Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
147
AN:
152182
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00140 AC: 351AN: 251356Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00153 AC XY: 208AN XY: 135836
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
351
AN:
251356
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
208
AN XY:
135836
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00143 AC: 2087AN: 1461846Hom.: 2 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00142 AC XY: 1034AN XY: 727214
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
2087
AN:
1461846
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
1034
AN XY:
727214
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000965 AC: 147AN: 152300Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000886 AC XY: 66AN XY: 74470
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
147
AN:
152300
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
66
AN XY:
74470
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
3
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
5
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
14
ExAC
AF:
AC:
169
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:12Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:6
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | Dec 01, 2016 | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Jul 07, 2017 | The p.Gly79Asp variant (rs143030960) has not been reported in the medical literature; although, it is listed in the ClinVar database as a variant of uncertain significance (Variation ID: 203970). It is listed in the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD) browser with a frequency in Ashkenazi Jewish populations of 0.67% (identified in 68 out of 10,150 chromosomes). The glycine at codon 79 is highly conserved considering 11 species up to Baker’s yeast (Alamut software v2.9), and computational analyses suggest this variant has a significant effect on SUCLG1 protein structure/function (SIFT: damaging, PolyPhen2: probably damaging, and Mutation Taster: disease causing). However, based on the available information, the clinical significance of the p.Gly79Asp variant cannot be determined with certainty. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | Aug 17, 2023 | BS1, PP3 - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jul 01, 2023 | - - |
Mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome 9 Uncertain:4Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Oct 31, 2018 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Medical Genetics and Human Genetics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin | Sep 22, 2022 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 22, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Revvity Omics, Revvity | Jan 29, 2023 | - - |
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genomic Diagnostic Laboratory, Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia | Oct 16, 2015 | - - |
Mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
SUCLG1-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Mar 23, 2020 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Pathogenic
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
CADD
Pathogenic
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
D
Eigen
Pathogenic
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
D
LIST_S2
Pathogenic
D
M_CAP
Pathogenic
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T
MetaSVM
Pathogenic
D
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
H
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
D
REVEL
Pathogenic
Sift
Uncertain
D
Sift4G
Uncertain
D
Polyphen
D
Vest4
MVP
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at