chr20-63895226-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_StrongBS2
The NM_025219.3(DNAJC5):c.-109A>G variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00122 in 149,670 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_025219.3 5_prime_UTR
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- ceroid lipofuscinosis, neuronal, 4 (Kufs type)Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp
- adult neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosisInheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_025219.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DNAJC5 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.-109A>G | 5_prime_UTR | Exon 1 of 5 | ENSP00000354111.4 | Q9H3Z4-1 | |||
| DNAJC5 | c.-104A>G | 5_prime_UTR | Exon 1 of 5 | ENSP00000568634.1 | |||||
| DNAJC5 | c.-21A>G | 5_prime_UTR | Exon 1 of 5 | ENSP00000592048.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00121 AC: 179AN: 147974Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00252 AC: 4AN: 1588Hom.: 0 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.00103 AC XY: 1AN XY: 972 show subpopulations ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00120 AC: 178AN: 148082Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00118 AC XY: 85AN XY: 72180 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at