chr22-19183443-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_007098.4(CLTCL1):āc.4774G>Cā(p.Val1592Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00131 in 1,613,658 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 21 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. V1592M) has been classified as Benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_007098.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLTCL1 | NM_007098.4 | c.4774G>C | p.Val1592Leu | missense_variant | 30/33 | ENST00000427926.6 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLTCL1 | ENST00000427926.6 | c.4774G>C | p.Val1592Leu | missense_variant | 30/33 | 1 | NM_007098.4 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00669 AC: 1018AN: 152210Hom.: 12 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00189 AC: 469AN: 248308Hom.: 6 AF XY: 0.00145 AC XY: 196AN XY: 134828
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000743 AC: 1086AN: 1461330Hom.: 9 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000637 AC XY: 463AN XY: 726938
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00676 AC: 1030AN: 152328Hom.: 12 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00631 AC XY: 470AN XY: 74480
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 31, 2019 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at