chr22-39619411-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 2 ACMG points: 2P and 0B. PM2
The NM_021096.4(CACNA1I):c.580+4A>G variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predicting alterations to normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_021096.4 splice_region, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CACNA1I | NM_021096.4 | c.580+4A>G | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | Intron 4 of 36 | ENST00000402142.4 | NP_066919.2 | ||
CACNA1I | NM_001003406.2 | c.580+4A>G | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | Intron 4 of 35 | NP_001003406.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CACNA1I | ENST00000402142.4 | c.580+4A>G | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | Intron 4 of 36 | 1 | NM_021096.4 | ENSP00000385019.3 | |||
CACNA1I | ENST00000404898.5 | c.580+4A>G | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | Intron 4 of 35 | 1 | ENSP00000384093.1 | ||||
CACNA1I | ENST00000401624.5 | c.580+4A>G | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | Intron 4 of 35 | 1 | ENSP00000383887.1 | ||||
CACNA1I | ENST00000407673.5 | c.580+4A>G | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | Intron 4 of 34 | 1 | ENSP00000385680.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 30
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1
Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (Lek et al., 2016); In silico analysis supports a deleterious effect on splicing -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at