chr3-30671822-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2
The NM_003242.6(TGFBR2):c.639C>T(p.Ser213=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000991 in 1,614,070 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000026 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00011 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
TGFBR2
NM_003242.6 synonymous
NM_003242.6 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -1.82
Genes affected
TGFBR2 (HGNC:11773): (transforming growth factor beta receptor 2) The protein encoded by this gene is a transmembrane protein that has a protein kinase domain, forms a heterodimeric complex with TGF-beta receptor type-1, and binds TGF-beta. This receptor/ligand complex phosphorylates proteins, which then enter the nucleus and regulate the transcription of genes related to cell proliferation, cell cycle arrest, wound healing, immunosuppression, and tumorigenesis. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Marfan Syndrome, Loeys-Deitz Aortic Aneurysm Syndrome, and the development of various types of tumors. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been characterized. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.55).
BP6
Variant 3-30671822-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-30671822-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 507705.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.82 with no splicing effect.
BS2
High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 156 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TGFBR2 | NM_003242.6 | c.639C>T | p.Ser213= | synonymous_variant | 4/7 | ENST00000295754.10 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TGFBR2 | ENST00000295754.10 | c.639C>T | p.Ser213= | synonymous_variant | 4/7 | 1 | NM_003242.6 | P1 | |
TGFBR2 | ENST00000359013.4 | c.714C>T | p.Ser238= | synonymous_variant | 5/8 | 1 | |||
TGFBR2 | ENST00000672866.1 | n.2235C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 4/7 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152196Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
4
AN:
152196
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000876 AC: 22AN: 251062Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000590 AC XY: 8AN XY: 135692
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
22
AN:
251062
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
8
AN XY:
135692
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000107 AC: 156AN: 1461874Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.0000990 AC XY: 72AN XY: 727240
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
156
AN:
1461874
Hom.:
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
AC XY:
72
AN XY:
727240
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152196Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74340
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
4
AN:
152196
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
74340
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Human Genetics, Inc, Center for Human Genetics, Inc | Nov 01, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Aug 22, 2022 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 11, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Feb 25, 2019 | - - |
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Feb 18, 2020 | - - |
Loeys-Dietz syndrome 2 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Nov 30, 2023 | - - |
TGFBR2-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Sep 17, 2023 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at