chr3-57235647-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BS2
The NM_012096.3(APPL1):c.136C>T(p.Arg46Trp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000123 in 1,460,246 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_012096.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000160 AC: 4AN: 250582Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000222 AC XY: 3AN XY: 135438
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000123 AC: 18AN: 1460246Hom.: 0 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.0000165 AC XY: 12AN XY: 726408
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1
The APPL1 p.Arg46Trp variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in ClinVar. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs765656762) and in control databases in 4 of 250582 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00001596 (Genome Aggregation Database March 6, 2019, v2.1.1). The variant was observed in the following populations: Latino in 2 of 34292 chromosomes (freq: 0.000058), East Asian in 1 of 18360 chromosomes (freq: 0.000054) and European (non-Finnish) in 1 of 113508 chromosomes (freq: 0.000009), but was not observed in the African, Ashkenazi Jewish, European (Finnish), Other, or South Asian populations. The p.Arg46 residue is conserved across mammals and other organisms, and four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) suggest that the variant may impact the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to assume pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at