chr4-148436323-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The ENST00000358102.8(NR3C2):c.538G>A(p.Val180Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.884 in 1,614,056 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 630,883 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000358102.8 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NR3C2 | NM_000901.5 | c.538G>A | p.Val180Ile | missense_variant | 2/9 | ENST00000358102.8 | NP_000892.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NR3C2 | ENST00000358102.8 | c.538G>A | p.Val180Ile | missense_variant | 2/9 | 1 | NM_000901.5 | ENSP00000350815 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.889 AC: 135239AN: 152074Hom.: 60223 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.877 AC: 220413AN: 251426Hom.: 96836 AF XY: 0.881 AC XY: 119686AN XY: 135880
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.883 AC: 1291015AN: 1461862Hom.: 570603 Cov.: 86 AF XY: 0.884 AC XY: 643200AN XY: 727236
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.889 AC: 135351AN: 152194Hom.: 60280 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.889 AC XY: 66180AN XY: 74408
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Mar 21, 2016 | p.Val180Ile in exon 2 of NR3C2: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it has been identified in 91.35% (6042/6614) of Finnish chrom osomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org ; dbSNP rs5522). - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 12, 2018 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 28249922, 12483305, 18468809, 19955850, 22584804, 22407082) - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Autosomal dominant pseudohypoaldosteronism type 1 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Mar 06, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Sep 05, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at