chr4-54261293-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_ModerateBS2
The NM_006206.6(PDGFRA):c.248C>T(p.Thr83Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000366 in 1,613,940 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. T83T) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_006206.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDGFRA | ENST00000257290.10 | c.248C>T | p.Thr83Met | missense_variant | Exon 3 of 23 | 1 | NM_006206.6 | ENSP00000257290.5 | ||
ENSG00000282278 | ENST00000507166.5 | c.1018-13632C>T | intron_variant | Intron 12 of 23 | 2 | ENSP00000423325.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000789 AC: 12AN: 152092Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000517 AC: 13AN: 251338Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000294 AC XY: 4AN XY: 135828
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000322 AC: 47AN: 1461848Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000220 AC XY: 16AN XY: 727222
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000789 AC: 12AN: 152092Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000673 AC XY: 5AN XY: 74282
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Ovarian cancer Pathogenic:1
- -
Polyps, multiple and recurrent inflammatory fibroid, gastrointestinal Uncertain:1
- -
PDGFRA-related disorder Uncertain:1
The PDGFRA c.248C>T variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Thr83Met. To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported as a germline variant in the literature. This variant is reported in 0.025% of alleles in individuals of East Asian descent in gnomAD and is interpreted as uncertain significance by most of the submitters in ClinVar (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/407420/). At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -
not provided Uncertain:1
In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -
Gastrointestinal stromal tumor Uncertain:1
This sequence change replaces threonine, which is neutral and polar, with methionine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 83 of the PDGFRA protein (p.Thr83Met). This variant is present in population databases (rs779332376, gnomAD 0.03%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with PDGFRA-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 407420). Invitae Evidence Modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt PDGFRA protein function with a negative predictive value of 80%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1
The c.248C>T (p.T83M) alteration is located in exon 3 (coding exon 2) of the PDGFRA gene. This alteration results from a C to T substitution at nucleotide position 248, causing the threonine (T) at amino acid position 83 to be replaced by a methionine (M). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at