chr5-112842104-A-C
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2
The NM_000038.6(APC):āc.6510A>Cā(p.Pro2170=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000559 in 1,611,150 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.00019 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š: 0.000042 ( 1 hom. )
Consequence
APC
NM_000038.6 synonymous
NM_000038.6 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.126
Genes affected
APC (HGNC:583): (APC regulator of WNT signaling pathway) This gene encodes a tumor suppressor protein that acts as an antagonist of the Wnt signaling pathway. It is also involved in other processes including cell migration and adhesion, transcriptional activation, and apoptosis. Defects in this gene cause familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), an autosomal dominant pre-malignant disease that usually progresses to malignancy. Mutations in the APC gene have been found to occur in most colorectal cancers, where disease-associated mutations tend to be clustered in a small region designated the mutation cluster region (MCR) and result in a truncated protein product. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2022]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.62).
BP6
Variant 5-112842104-A-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-112842104-A-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 184071.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr5-112842104-A-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.126 with no splicing effect.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 29 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APC | NM_000038.6 | c.6510A>C | p.Pro2170= | synonymous_variant | 16/16 | ENST00000257430.9 | NP_000029.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APC | ENST00000257430.9 | c.6510A>C | p.Pro2170= | synonymous_variant | 16/16 | 5 | NM_000038.6 | ENSP00000257430 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000164 AC: 25AN: 152202Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
25
AN:
152202
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000802 AC: 20AN: 249308Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000813 AC XY: 11AN XY: 135276
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
20
AN:
249308
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
11
AN XY:
135276
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000418 AC: 61AN: 1458830Hom.: 1 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.0000455 AC XY: 33AN XY: 725902
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
61
AN:
1458830
Hom.:
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
AC XY:
33
AN XY:
725902
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000190 AC: 29AN: 152320Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000215 AC XY: 16AN XY: 74486
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
29
AN:
152320
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
16
AN XY:
74486
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
4
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:17
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Familial adenomatous polyposis 1 Benign:6
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The APC p.Pro2170= variant was identified in 1 of 42 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.02) from individuals or families with FAP (Leon 2013). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs138571760) as "With other allele", ClinVar (classified as benign by GeneDx and Integrated Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America; as likely benign by Invitae, Ambry Genetics and four other submitters). The variant was not identified in LOVD 3.0. The variant was identified in our laboratory with a co-occurring pathogenic APC variant (c.3329C>G (p.Ser1110*)), increasing the likelihood that the p.Pro2170= variant does not have clinical significance. The variant was identified in control databases in 25 of 275938 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00009 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 10 of 23862 chromosomes (freq: 0.0004), Other in 3 of 6442 chromosomes (freq: 0.0005), Latino in 7 of 34288 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), European in 5 of 126090 chromosomes (freq: 0.00004), while the variant was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, Finnish, and South Asian populations. The p.Pro2170= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and 2 of 4 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing; this is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Mar 08, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Feb 17, 2023 | This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 24, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
not provided Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Feb 23, 2017 | Variant summary: The APC c.6510A>C (p.Pro2170Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide, which 3/5 splice prediction tools predict an impact on normal splicing. ESE finder predicts that this variant may alter ESE binding. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. This variant was found in 10/119892 control chromosomes, predominantly observed in the African subpopulation at a frequency of 0.000725 (7/9652). This frequency is about 10 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic APC variant (0.0000714), suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in population(s) of African origin. A publication cites the variant in affected individual, however, with limited information (ie, lack of co-occurrence and cosegregation data) and listing it as a "constitutional polymorphism" without providing evidence to evaluate. In addition, a clinical diagnostic laboratory cites the variant with a classification of "likely benign." Therefore, the variant of interest has been classified as Benign. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jan 12, 2018 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Sep 01, 2024 | APC: BP4, BP7 - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 09, 2015 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Aug 04, 2020 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | May 03, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Dec 26, 2014 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Jun 16, 2016 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at