chr5-1280296-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_198253.3(TERT):​c.1812A>G​(p.Ala604Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00337 in 1,613,634 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 10 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0025 ( 0 hom., cov: 34)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0035 ( 10 hom. )

Consequence

TERT
NM_198253.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:16

Conservation

PhyloP100: -4.57

Publications

5 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
TERT (HGNC:11730): (telomerase reverse transcriptase) Telomerase is a ribonucleoprotein polymerase that maintains telomere ends by addition of the telomere repeat TTAGGG. The enzyme consists of a protein component with reverse transcriptase activity, encoded by this gene, and an RNA component which serves as a template for the telomere repeat. Telomerase expression plays a role in cellular senescence, as it is normally repressed in postnatal somatic cells resulting in progressive shortening of telomeres. Deregulation of telomerase expression in somatic cells may be involved in oncogenesis. Studies in mouse suggest that telomerase also participates in chromosomal repair, since de novo synthesis of telomere repeats may occur at double-stranded breaks. Alternatively spliced variants encoding different isoforms of telomerase reverse transcriptase have been identified; the full-length sequence of some variants has not been determined. Alternative splicing at this locus is thought to be one mechanism of regulation of telomerase activity. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
TERT Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • pulmonary fibrosis and/or bone marrow failure, Telomere-related, 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • dyskeratosis congenita, autosomal dominant 2
    Inheritance: AR, AD, SD, Unknown Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, G2P, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine
  • acute myeloid leukemia
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp
  • dyskeratosis congenita
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Hoyeraal-Hreidarsson syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • melanoma, cutaneous malignant, susceptibility to, 9
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.95).
BP6
Variant 5-1280296-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-1280296-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 165379.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-4.57 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00248 (378/152360) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00382 (260/68030). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00344. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 171 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 34. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 10 AR,AD,SD,Unknown gene

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_198253.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
TERT
NM_198253.3
MANE Select
c.1812A>Gp.Ala604Ala
synonymous
Exon 4 of 16NP_937983.2
TERT
NM_001193376.3
c.1812A>Gp.Ala604Ala
synonymous
Exon 4 of 15NP_001180305.1
TERT
NR_149162.3
n.1891A>G
non_coding_transcript_exon
Exon 4 of 13

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
TERT
ENST00000310581.10
TSL:1 MANE Select
c.1812A>Gp.Ala604Ala
synonymous
Exon 4 of 16ENSP00000309572.5
TERT
ENST00000334602.10
TSL:1
c.1812A>Gp.Ala604Ala
synonymous
Exon 4 of 15ENSP00000334346.6
TERT
ENST00000460137.6
TSL:1
n.1812A>G
non_coding_transcript_exon
Exon 4 of 13ENSP00000425003.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00248
AC:
378
AN:
152242
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
34
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000868
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00229
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00779
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00248
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000282
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00382
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00239
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00243
AC:
611
AN:
251096
AF XY:
0.00255
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000555
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00104
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00586
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000647
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00360
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00277
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00346
AC:
5058
AN:
1461274
Hom.:
10
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00329
AC XY:
2389
AN XY:
726950
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000568
AC:
19
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00114
AC:
51
AN:
44722
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00608
AC:
159
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000252
AC:
1
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00228
AC:
197
AN:
86256
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000662
AC:
35
AN:
52844
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000348
AC:
2
AN:
5752
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00394
AC:
4380
AN:
1111994
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00354
AC:
214
AN:
60390
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.478
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
296
593
889
1186
1482
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
176
352
528
704
880
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00248
AC:
378
AN:
152360
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.00230
AC XY:
171
AN XY:
74504
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000866
AC:
36
AN:
41590
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00229
AC:
35
AN:
15306
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00779
AC:
27
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5186
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00248
AC:
12
AN:
4830
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000282
AC:
3
AN:
10628
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00382
AC:
260
AN:
68030
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00236
AC:
5
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.511
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
22
43
65
86
108
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00373
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00239
EpiCase
AF:
0.00278
EpiControl
AF:
0.00302

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:16
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:6
Oct 13, 2021
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 16110488)

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Aug 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

TERT: BP4, BP7

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

not specified Benign:4
Feb 21, 2013
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Ala604Ala in exon 4 of TERT: This variant is not expected to have clinical signi ficance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located withi n the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 0.4% (32/8600) of Eur opean American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs33959226).

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jun 19, 2017
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Dyskeratosis congenita Benign:2
Jul 13, 2021
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

Aug 03, 2017
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Aplastic anemia Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease.

Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis;C3151443:Dyskeratosis congenita, autosomal dominant 2 Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Dyskeratosis congenita, autosomal dominant 2 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease.

Pulmonary fibrosis and/or bone marrow failure, Telomere-related, 1 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.95
CADD
Benign
0.036
DANN
Benign
0.30
PhyloP100
-4.6
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs33959226; hg19: chr5-1280411; API