chr5-128261729-T-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001999.4(FBN2):​c.8364+7A>T variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00162 in 1,614,014 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0012 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0017 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

FBN2
NM_001999.4 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.00001784
2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:15

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0910
Variant links:
Genes affected
FBN2 (HGNC:3604): (fibrillin 2) The protein encoded by this gene is a component of connective tissue microfibrils and may be involved in elastic fiber assembly. Mutations in this gene cause congenital contractural arachnodactyly. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.79).
BP6
Variant 5-128261729-T-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-128261729-T-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 137355.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr5-128261729-T-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr5-128261729-T-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00119 (182/152378) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00218 (148/68040). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00189. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 76 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 182 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
FBN2NM_001999.4 linkc.8364+7A>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 64 of 64 ENST00000262464.9 NP_001990.2 P35556-1
FBN2XM_017009228.3 linkc.8211+7A>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 63 of 63 XP_016864717.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
FBN2ENST00000262464.9 linkc.8364+7A>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 64 of 64 1 NM_001999.4 ENSP00000262464.4 P35556-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00120
AC:
182
AN:
152260
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000265
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00118
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000576
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0000941
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00217
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000955
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00107
AC:
268
AN:
251120
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.00110
AC XY:
149
AN XY:
135704
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000369
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000810
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000993
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000653
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000323
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00190
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00147
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00167
AC:
2435
AN:
1461636
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00157
AC XY:
1145
AN XY:
727130
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000418
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000939
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.000153
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000104
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000449
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00203
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00132
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00119
AC:
182
AN:
152378
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00102
AC XY:
76
AN XY:
74520
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000264
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00118
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.000576
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0000941
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00218
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000945
Alfa
AF:
0.00122
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00113
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000866
AC:
3
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00300
EpiControl
AF:
0.00219

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:15
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Congenital contractural arachnodactyly Benign:5
Jan 29, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 19, 2017
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 09, 2014
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Nov 21, 2014
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:4
Mar 30, 2014
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Jul 30, 2023
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 13, 2016
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:3
Oct 20, 2022
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

FBN2: BP4, BS1 -

Connective tissue disorder Benign:2
Nov 03, 2021
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 01, 2018
Center for Human Genetics, Inc, Center for Human Genetics, Inc
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Benign:1
Mar 01, 2022
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.79
CADD
Benign
3.7
DANN
Benign
0.47

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.000018
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.0
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs185052980; hg19: chr5-127597421; API