chr5-128277933-C-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -18 ACMG points: 0P and 18B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_001999.4(FBN2):c.7418G>T(p.Arg2473Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000376 in 1,614,066 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R2473Q) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001999.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- congenital contractural arachnodactylyInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Genomics England PanelApp
- carpal tunnel syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Franklin by Genoox
- familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissectionInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
- macular degeneration, early-onsetInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -18 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000302 AC: 46AN: 152140Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000426 AC: 107AN: 251156 AF XY: 0.000405 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000384 AC: 561AN: 1461808Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000366 AC XY: 266AN XY: 727208 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000302 AC: 46AN: 152258Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000363 AC XY: 27AN XY: 74448 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Congenital contractural arachnodactyly Benign:2
- -
- -
not specified Benign:1
Variant summary: FBN2 c.7418G>T (p.Arg2473Leu) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the EGF-like domain (IPR000742) of the encoded protein sequence. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function all suggest that this variant is likely to be disruptive. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00043 in 251156 control chromosomes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 340-fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in FBN2 causing Aortopathy phenotype (1.3e-06), strongly suggesting the variant is benign. c.7418G>T has been reported as a likely benign change in individuals affected with Marfan and Marfan-like syndromes (e.g. Wooderchak-Donahue_2015). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Aortopathy. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publication have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 25944730). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 213427). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -
FBN2-related disorder Benign:1
This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:1
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
not provided Benign:1
See Variant Classification Assertion Criteria. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at