chr5-128289877-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_001999.4(FBN2):c.6511+5G>A variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00446 in 1,540,266 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 34 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 2/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001999.4 splice_region, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- congenital contractural arachnodactylyInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Genomics England PanelApp
- carpal tunnel syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Franklin by Genoox
- familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissectionInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
- macular degeneration, early-onsetInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBN2 | ENST00000262464.9 | c.6511+5G>A | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | Intron 51 of 64 | 1 | NM_001999.4 | ENSP00000262464.4 | |||
| FBN2 | ENST00000703783.1 | n.3295+5G>A | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | Intron 26 of 37 | ||||||
| FBN2 | ENST00000703785.1 | n.3214+5G>A | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | Intron 25 of 26 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00345 AC: 525AN: 152032Hom.: 5 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00390 AC: 973AN: 249676 AF XY: 0.00401 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00458 AC: 6352AN: 1388116Hom.: 29 Cov.: 24 AF XY: 0.00449 AC XY: 3119AN XY: 695020 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00345 AC: 525AN: 152150Hom.: 5 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00323 AC XY: 240AN XY: 74390 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:5
Variant summary: The FBN2 c.6511+5G>A variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved intronic nucleotide. One in silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 5/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing and ESE Finder predicts no significant effect on ESE sites at the locus. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. This variant was found in ExAC at a frequency of 0.0049729 (549/110398 control chromosomes [2 homozygotes]), which is approximately 3978 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic FBN2 variant (0.0000013), suggesting this variant is likely a benign polymorphism. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as benign. To our knowledge, the variant of interest has not been reported in affected individuals via publications, nor has it been evaluated for functional impact by in vivo/vitro studies. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. -
- -
- -
- -
FBN2: BP4, BS1, BS2 -
not specified Benign:3
- -
- -
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Congenital contractural arachnodactyly Benign:2
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
- -
Congenital contractural arachnodactyly;C4015286:Macular degeneration, early-onset Uncertain:1
FBN2 NM_001999 exon 51 c.6511+5G>A: This variant has not been reported in the literature but is present in 0.7% (894/125710) of European individuals including 3 homozygotes in the Genome Aggregation Database (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/rs200608284). This variant is present in ClinVar, with several labs classifying this variant as likely benign or benign (Variation ID:137344). Evolutionary conservation and computational predictive tools for this variant are limited or unavailable. This variant is an intronic variant with no predicted change in the amino acid sequence but may have an unknown effect on splicing. Further studies are needed to understand its impact. In summary, data on this variant is insufficient for disease classification. Therefore, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain. -
Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:1
This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Benign:1
- -
Connective tissue disorder Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at