chr5-128330620-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points: 2P and 11B. PM1BP4_ModerateBP6BS1BS2

The NM_001999.4(FBN2):c.4298G>A(p.Arg1433His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000638 in 1,613,898 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R1433C) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00021 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000049 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

FBN2
NM_001999.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.23

Publications

4 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

FBN2 (HGNC:3604): (fibrillin 2) The protein encoded by this gene is a component of connective tissue microfibrils and may be involved in elastic fiber assembly. Mutations in this gene cause congenital contractural arachnodactyly. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

FBN2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

congenital contractural arachnodactyly
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Genomics England PanelApp
carpal tunnel syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Franklin by Genoox
familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection
Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
macular degeneration, early-onset
Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)

FBN2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points.

PM1

In a hotspot region, there are 8 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 5 benign, 5 uncertain in NM_001999.4

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.19709238).

BP6

Variant 5-128330620-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-128330620-C-T is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 388711.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00021 (32/152228) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.00053 (22/41548). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000358. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 15 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 32 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
FBN2	NM_001999.4 link	c.4298G>A	p.Arg1433His	missense_variant	Exon 33 of 65	ENST00000262464.9	NP_001990.2	P35556-1
FBN2	XM_017009228.3 link	c.4145G>A	p.Arg1382His	missense_variant	Exon 32 of 64		XP_016864717.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
FBN2	ENST00000262464.9 link	c.4298G>A	p.Arg1433His	missense_variant	Exon 33 of 65	1	NM_001999.4	ENSP00000262464.4		P35556-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000210

AC:

AN:

152110

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000531

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000328

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000735

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.0000716

AC:

AN:

251300

AF XY:

0.0000663

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000554

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000616

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000326

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000486

AC:

AN:

1461670

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000605

AC XY:

AN XY:

727152

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000209

AC:

AN:

33472

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000224

AC:

AN:

44706

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26134

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39694

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86254

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53416

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00104

AC:

AN:

5764

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000477

AC:

AN:

1111848

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0000662

AC:

AN:

60382

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.468

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000210

AC:

AN:

152228

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000202

AC XY:

AN XY:

74414

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000530

AC:

AN:

41548

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000327

AC:

AN:

15278

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5180

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4814

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10604

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

292

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000735

AC:

AN:

68020

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2108

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.489

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.0000910

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000151

ExAC

AF:

0.0000741

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.000164

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Congenital contractural arachnodactyly

Benign:2

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Nov 15, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided

Uncertain:1

Nov 22, 2023

GeneDx

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Although located in a calcium-binding EGF-like domain of the FBN2 gene, it does not substitute or introduce a cysteine residue (PMID: 18767143, 19006240); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 18767143, 19006240) -

Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection

Benign:1

Dec 16, 2020

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome

Benign:1

Apr 12, 2021

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Connective tissue disorder

Benign:1

Nov 01, 2016

Center for Human Genetics, Inc, Center for Human Genetics, Inc

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.070

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.18

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.18

CADD

Uncertain

(source)

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.67

D;.;D;D;D

Eigen

Benign

0.078

Eigen_PC

Benign

0.22

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.90

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.90

D;.;.;D;D

M_CAP

Benign

0.050

MetaRNN

Benign

0.20

T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Uncertain

0.044

MutationAssessor

Benign

-0.22

N;.;N;.;.

PhyloP100

3.2

PrimateAI

Benign

0.33

PROVEAN

Uncertain

-3.4

D;.;D;D;D

REVEL

Uncertain

0.39

Sift

Benign

0.083

T;.;T;T;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.21

.;.;.;T;T

Polyphen

0.0060

B;.;B;.;B

Vest4

0.38

MVP

0.57

MPC

0.34

ClinPred

0.070

GERP RS

4.3

Varity_R

0.10

gMVP

0.54

Mutation Taster

=77/23

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over