chr5-128349443-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 1P and 20B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The ENST00000262464.9(FBN2):c.2893G>A(p.Val965Ile) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.694 in 1,613,198 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 390,972 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.69 ( 35996 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.69 ( 354976 hom. )
Consequence
FBN2
ENST00000262464.9 missense
ENST00000262464.9 missense
Scores
2
16
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 4.11
Genes affected
FBN2 (HGNC:3604): (fibrillin 2) The protein encoded by this gene is a component of connective tissue microfibrils and may be involved in elastic fiber assembly. Mutations in this gene cause congenital contractural arachnodactyly. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
PP2
Missense variant in gene, where missense usually causes diseases (based on misZ statistic), FBN2. . Gene score misZ 1.5491 (greater than the threshold 3.09). Trascript score misZ 3.2752 (greater than threshold 3.09). GenCC has associacion of gene with familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection, carpal tunnel syndrome, macular degeneration, early-onset, congenital contractural arachnodactyly.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=3.1779655E-6).
BP6
Variant 5-128349443-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-128349443-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 129039.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr5-128349443-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.899 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBN2 | NM_001999.4 | c.2893G>A | p.Val965Ile | missense_variant | 23/65 | ENST00000262464.9 | NP_001990.2 | |
FBN2 | XM_017009228.3 | c.2740G>A | p.Val914Ile | missense_variant | 22/64 | XP_016864717.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBN2 | ENST00000262464.9 | c.2893G>A | p.Val965Ile | missense_variant | 23/65 | 1 | NM_001999.4 | ENSP00000262464 | P1 | |
FBN2 | ENST00000508989.5 | c.2794G>A | p.Val932Ile | missense_variant | 22/33 | 2 | ENSP00000425596 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.686 AC: 104185AN: 151884Hom.: 35967 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
104185
AN:
151884
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.728 AC: 182726AN: 250892Hom.: 67593 AF XY: 0.725 AC XY: 98239AN XY: 135580
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
182726
AN:
250892
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
98239
AN XY:
135580
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.695 AC: 1015407AN: 1461196Hom.: 354976 Cov.: 44 AF XY: 0.696 AC XY: 505945AN XY: 726886
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1015407
AN:
1461196
Hom.:
Cov.:
44
AF XY:
AC XY:
505945
AN XY:
726886
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.686 AC: 104264AN: 152002Hom.: 35996 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.690 AC XY: 51239AN XY: 74286
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
104264
AN:
152002
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
51239
AN XY:
74286
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
2531
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
2651
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
2766
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
5846
ExAC
AF:
AC:
87775
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
2829
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:17
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Congenital contractural arachnodactyly Benign:6
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Aug 10, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | Feb 04, 2014 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | May 31, 2017 | - - |
not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Aug 15, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 13, 2012 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Dec 02, 2014 | This is a RefSeq error. The reference base (c.2893G) is the minor allele. This a llele (G) has been identified in 32% (2754/8600) of European American chromosome s and 37% (1640/4406) of African American chromosomes by the NHLBI Exome Sequenc ing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/; dbSNP rs154001) and thus meets c riteria to be classified as benign. - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Mar 22, 2017 | Variant summary: The FBN2 c.2893G>A (p.Val965Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide that 4/4 in silico tools (Mutation Taster not captured here due to low p-value) predict a benign outcome. The variant of interest was observed in the large, broad control population, ExAC, with an allele frequency of 0.7233944 (87496/120952 (32094 homozygotes)), therefore, suggesting that the A allele is the major allele, the allele most commonly observed in the general population. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as benign. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 30, 2023 | - - |
Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 19, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children | Jul 16, 2022 | - - |
Macular degeneration, early-onset Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Aug 10, 2021 | - - |
Connective tissue disorder Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children | Jul 18, 2022 | - - |
Congenital contractural arachnodactyly;C4015286:Macular degeneration, early-onset Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Aug 11, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Benign
T;.;T;T
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Benign
T;.;.;T
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
N;.;N;.
MutationTaster
Benign
P;P;P
PrimateAI
Benign
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N;.;N;N
REVEL
Benign
Sift
Benign
T;.;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
.;.;.;T
Polyphen
B;.;B;B
Vest4
MPC
0.21
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at