chr5-128537446-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 1P and 9B. PP2BP6BS1BS2
The NM_001999.4(FBN2):c.158G>A(p.Gly53Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000305 in 1,608,018 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. G53S) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001999.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBN2 | NM_001999.4 | c.158G>A | p.Gly53Asp | missense_variant | 1/65 | ENST00000262464.9 | |
FBN2 | XM_017009228.3 | c.158G>A | p.Gly53Asp | missense_variant | 1/64 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBN2 | ENST00000262464.9 | c.158G>A | p.Gly53Asp | missense_variant | 1/65 | 1 | NM_001999.4 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000131 AC: 20AN: 152200Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000383 AC: 9AN: 235112Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000546 AC XY: 7AN XY: 128228
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000199 AC: 29AN: 1455700Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000221 AC XY: 16AN XY: 723864
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000131 AC: 20AN: 152318Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000121 AC XY: 9AN XY: 74474
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Jun 02, 2015 | - - |
Congenital contractural arachnodactyly Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Nov 02, 2023 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at